City of Lauderhill  
City Commission Chambers at City Hall  
5581 W. Oakland Park Blvd.  
Lauderhill, FL, 33313  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Monday, July 10, 2023  
6:00 PM  
City Commission Chambers  
City Commission Meeting  
LAUDERHILL CITY COMMISSION  
Mayor Ken Thurston  
Vice Mayor Sarai Martin  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn  
Commissioner Denise D. Grant  
Commissioner Lawrence Martin  
Desorae Giles-Smith, City Manager  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
Angel Petti Rosenberg, City Attorney  
I CALL TO ORDER  
Mayor Thurston called to order the Regular City Commission Meeting at 6:02 PM.  
II ROLL CALL  
5 -  
Present:  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn,Commissioner Denise D. Grant,Commissioner  
Lawrence Martin,Vice Mayor Sarai Martin, and Mayor Ken Thurston  
ALSO PRESENT:  
Desorae Giles-Smith, City Manager  
Angel Petti Rosenberg, City Attorney  
Constance Stanley, Police Chief  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
III COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (AND RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC, IF  
THE TIME PERMITS DURING THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION)  
IV ADJOURNMENT (NO LATER THAN 6:30 PM)  
I CALL TO ORDER OF REGULAR MEETING  
II PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG FOLLOWED BY GOOD AND WELFARE  
HOUSEKEEPING  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Mayor K. Thurston, to  
ACCEPT the Revised Version of the City Commission Meeting Agenda for July 10,  
2023 and to hear item 17 first. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
III CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Mayor K. Thurston,  
that this Consent Agenda was approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
IV APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR JUNE 12, 2023.  
A.  
These Minutes were approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR JUNE 26, 2023.  
B.  
These Minutes were approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
V PROCLAMATIONS / COMMENDATIONS  
A.  
B.  
A PROCLAMATION DECLARING JULY 2023 AS FIBROID AWARENESS  
MONTH (REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER DENISE D. GRANT).  
A
PROCLAMATION HONORING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF  
INDEPENDENCE OF THE BAHAMAS (REQUESTED BY  
COMMISSIONER LAWRENCE “JABBOW” MARTIN).  
VI SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS (10 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
A.  
A BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT PRESENTATION (REQUESTED BY  
CITY MANAGER DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
B.  
A PRESENTATION OF THE 2023 EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD  
SCHOLARSHIP WINNERS (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER  
DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
C.  
CRICKET AND WORLD CUP UPDATE (REQUESTED BY MAYOR KEN  
THURSTON).  
VII GENERAL PRESENTATIONS (5 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
A. ITEM REMOVED  
B.  
A
PRESENTATION ON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA  
FUNDS) (REQUESTED BY VICE MAYOR SARAI "RAY" MARTIN).  
C.  
AN  
UPDATE  
ON  
MOSQUITO  
CONTROL  
(REQUESTED  
BY  
COMMISSIONER LAWRENCE "JABBOW" MARTIN).  
X RESOLUTIONS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
17.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-181:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL REQUESTING CITY  
STAFF TO ALLOCATE EXPENDITURES WITHIN THE BUDGET IN  
ORDER TO SPEND THE REMAINING BALANCE OF ALL AMERICAN  
RESCUE PLAN ACT ("ARPA") DOLLARS WITHIN FISCAL YEAR 2023;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY VICE  
MAYOR SARAI "RAY" MARTIN).  
Vice Mayor S. Martin mentioned residents reached out to him regarding their trying  
to apply for financial assistance through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA);  
while some applicants were waiting on research by City staff, others were denied  
due to the closing of the program. Thus, the City had funds available, and  
Lauderhill residents still in need of rent/mortgage assistance, but he understood the  
City was not funding for the reasons he stated above, along with the City  
reallocating some of its ARPA funds for the upcoming fiscal year (FY) 2024. He  
asked his colleagues to join him in directing the staff in the Finance and Grants  
Departments to continue to respond to residents, and satisfy their need for financial  
assistance before the end of the current fiscal year. This action would yield the  
additional benefit of allowing the Finance Department to explore options and  
courses of action to possibly reduce taxes for FY 2024.  
Mayor Thurston mentioned the Commission received the City Manager’s proposed  
budget for FY 2024, so he asked what the impact would be if Vice Mayor S. Martin’s  
request were approved.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin commented that his request would not affect the City  
Manager’s proposed budget for FY 2024 unless staff came back with a revised  
proposed budget in which taxes were reduced. He understood the manner in which  
staff proposed to spend the remaining $3.3 million of ARPA funds affected none of  
the City’s capital projects, it only affected salaries.  
Deputy City Manager/Finance Director Kennie Hobbs affirmed some ARPA dollars  
were allocated for FY 2024 as part of the City Manager’s proposed budget,  
recapping that the City received approximately $18 million, and, to date, about $9  
million had been spent. Staff projected spending by the end of the current fiscal  
year was an additional $6 million, leading to the $3 million mentioned by Vice Mayor  
S. Martin. He noted, in going through the City’s process, the uses of ARPA dollars  
did include capital projects, as there were a number of them, and staff reviewed  
how the City could spend the remaining ARPA dollars in the current fiscal year, and  
not roll any of those monies into the next fiscal year. The only real opportunity to do  
so was through operational expenditures, the largest of which was salaries. Mr.  
Hobbs identified some of the original uses planned for the ARPA dollars that would  
be impacted, as there were some capital projects predating the ARPA monies that  
had some shortfalls, and those were made up using some ARPA dollars. The  
original uses for which staff considered the ARPA included capital projects, such  
as: improvements to Wolk Park, the City Hall Annex, and the Lauderhill Sports Park;  
making up the shortfall for the St. George pool; citywide park marquees; citywide  
neighborhood walls; improvements along NW 38th Avenue; commercial and  
residential grants; and salaries. He affirmed it was possible to spend the remaining  
ARPA dollars in the manner requested by Vice Mayor S. Martin, but the bigger issue  
the City had for the next fiscal year was not just the prohibition of being able to roll  
taxes back due to use of ARPA funds in the same fiscal year, as the City already  
had a balanced budget, in which those funds were included, so staff’s position was  
taxes could not be rolled back until the ARPA funds were fully expended. Fiscal  
Year 2025 was the next year in which staff anticipated it being possible to look at  
rolling taxes back. He noted one element that was even more of an impediment to  
rolling taxes back than the use of ARPA funds was the deficit, which did not take  
into consideration the spending of ARPA dollars, or the tax roll back; this was a real  
increase, so it was inaccurate to believe the City could function on the same  
amount of the previous fiscal year’s budget. There were built in increases that took  
place, such as the 60 percent increase in insurance that had to be accommodated;  
as the City collected the same amount of revenue as it had the previous year, just  
with the increase in insurance only, the City had more expenses than revenue. He  
indicated the City had employee bargaining contracts: two for the police, one for  
fire, and one for the general employees, all of which the City was obligated to fulfill  
in the next fiscal year. Thus, the City’s expenses for the coming fiscal year would  
not be the same as they were for the current fiscal year, and the efforts to make up  
that deficit would be further exacerbated by rolling back taxes in the next fiscal year.  
He said, as stated in the Manager’s proposed budget, staff took all these factors  
into consideration, and if the Commission directed staff to expend all ARPA dollars  
in the current fiscal year, so taxes could be rolled back in the next fiscal year, the  
size of the deficit would increase. Mr. Hobbs stated the balance of the City’s  
General Fund was roughly $4.5 million; there were other monies in the enterprise  
funds, such as from water and sewer services, so to roll taxes back, by expending  
the $3.3 million before the end of the current fiscal year, the deficit would increase,  
and services might have to be reduced.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin believed the intent of the ARPA funds was to help struggling  
households and businesses, and help cities recover some of their lost revenue due  
to the COVID 19 pandemic. He did not believe the intent was to run a city, or offset  
inflation, or offset higher insurance, and though the City could use ARPA dollars in a  
manner that helped the City address its deficit due to inflation, this was not the  
intent, and the increase in expenses would still be there for FY 2025 without the  
help of any ARPA dollars; this indicated the City was likely to have some bigger  
financial struggles in the future. He restated his request to use the $3.3 million in  
the current fiscal year, and if this meant it was still not possible to roll back taxes in  
the next fiscal year, he could accept that, and there could be further discussion  
about the matter at the July 11, 2023, budget workshop. Going into the next fiscal  
year with all the increases mentioned by Mr. Hobbs indicated to him the City’s  
financial challenges were much bigger than $3.3 million; it seemed it would take  
much more funding to fix the situation. He believed, as things stood currently, if  
ARPA dollars remained in the next fiscal year’s budget, staff was not in any position  
consider anything related to reducing taxes.  
Mr. Hobbs remarked, regarding the intent of the ARPA dollars, staff also looked at  
the regulations for the use of those monies, and staff spoke with federal  
government staff on the matter, and from their perspective, staff believed the larger  
intent of ARPA dollars was revenue replacement; the extreme loss of revenue due  
to the pandemic. Losing revenue meant a loss in the ability to pay for services,  
salaries, etc., so it was not a matter of bad planning, as no one anticipated the  
pandemic, but the City always planned to pay for its fire and police services, and  
other traditional expenses that took place year over year. He reiterated, due to the  
unanticipated expenses resulting from the pandemic, the staff felt the best use of  
ARPA dollars was revenue replacement; and had there been no pandemic, the City  
would have sufficient funding to pay for its traditional services, and address other  
increases. Part of the challenge Finance staff faced was to manage the City’s  
funds, trying to make sure the City did not spend more than it collected in revenue;  
and this was not a one-year process, rather it was a few years in the future when  
staff went through this exercise. Mr. Hobbs said staff was compiling five-year  
budget projections based on the City Commission’s request that would be  
presented to the Commission in August 2023. He added, how the City was using  
its ARPA dollars was consistent with how they were being used throughout  
Broward County, which staff surveyed, contacting other Broward cities to find out  
how they were utilizing their ARPA funds. Even though it might appear the funds  
were being used to pay for capital projects, etc., without the pandemic, cities would  
have the funding needed to cover such expenses, particularly in light of increases in  
revenue due to increases in property values, and from other sources, such as new  
development and redevelopment. Staff would review all these factors, and other  
financial details in the upcoming budget workshop.  
Commissioner L. Martin observed it was not possible to control the future, and  
though staff planned to spend about $6 million of the remaining $9 million in the  
current fiscal year, there was no way to predict the obstacles that might prevent  
their expenditure. The fact that the City Manager’s proposed budget was a  
balanced one, the time to ask staff to try to expend all ARPA dollars before the end  
of the current fiscal year should have come earlier in the calendar year, as the City  
was now in the final quarter of its current fiscal year; staff updated the Commission  
at the end of each quarter on the City’s revenues, expenditures, etc. He had no  
wish for any plans staff had to expend the $6 million in ARPA dollars to get stalled,  
but the unexpected happened, and he fully supported finding ways to lower City  
taxes on residents, but this must be done in a smart way that did not derail the  
City’s services, etc. Everyone agreed inflation was driving prices up in all areas of  
life, so if the City arbitrarily dropped its millage rate by even one mil down to 7.119  
for FY 2024, only to discover that for FY 2025 there was such a shortfall that  
necessitated increasing the millage rate or cut services, which he felt such cuts  
were likely to directly affect public safety. Commissioner L. Martin commented the  
City was currently in a position to enter its next fiscal year with a positive cashflow,  
the ability to build up its fund balance, and then consider ways to reduce taxes in FY  
2025 with increased revenues from new construction coming into the City. He  
cautioned Lauderhill’s taxpayers to understand the meaning of the percentages on  
their tax bill, as he, too, paid a considerable amount in taxes each year. Again, until  
the City spent the $6 million, it currently had about $9 million in ARPA funding in the  
bank, and if left unspent, it had to be returned to the federal government by the end  
of 2025; hopefully, the City would expend its allocation long before that time.  
City Manager Giles-Smith said Vice Mayor S. Martin was right in believing one of the  
ways to expend the ARPA dollars was to help households and small businesses,  
but in reading the language of the ARPA legislation, the first intent stated was to  
provide $350 billion to help states, counties, cities, and tribal governments cover  
increased expenditures, replenish lost revenue, and mitigate economic harm from  
the COVID 19 pandemic. She noted the City lost revenue in the pandemic, as  
projects slowed down, some to a stop, revenues were diminished, such as from  
the gas tax, as people were no longer going out to do business of any kind as  
before; many traditional sources of revenue either disappeared or decreased  
severely. The federal government did a wise thing when it allocated the ARPA  
funds to help municipalities replenish their revenue without them having to resort to  
drastic measures. As part of the intent was to help small businesses and  
residents, she believed the City was doing this, and would continue to do so where  
possible.  
Mayor Thurston commented that the City had an obligation to report its millage rate  
to Broward County, so a TRIM notice could be sent to taxpayers, asking the date by  
which this had to be done.  
City Attorney Rosenberg replied August 4, 2023.  
Mr. Hobbs explained the City proposed submitting the current recommended rate of  
8.1999; there was an ability, legally, as it related to the TRIM notice for  
municipalities to reduce that rate, not increase it.  
Mayor Thurston felt the subject of discussion was such a major item that should  
have been discussed earlier in the year, as it seemed the City was not giving itself  
ample time to study the issue to be certain if options being considered were  
appropriate. He could not support directing staff to do as Vice Mayor S. Martin  
requested, as there was not enough time to work out all the details.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin recalled bringing the matter up previously to City staff and the  
Finance Department four or five months ago; this was an ongoing issue, and  
because there was no resolution, this was his reason for bringing the matter up  
before the Commission. This was not a last-minute request based on the work he  
was doing for the community behind the scenes, and it was due to not achieving a  
resolution that he felt it was his responsibility to bring the matter to his colleagues at  
the present time.  
Mayor Thurston thought sufficient time had been spent debating the matter, asking  
the Commission to decide on how they wished to proceed. He received a motion to  
approve from Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Commissioner Dunn seconded the motion.  
Commissioner Dunn thought the Mayor’s point was valid, as she felt she lacked  
sufficient information on which to make a solid decision she was comfortable with.  
She expressed the following concerns: staff’s ability to spend $9 million by  
September 30, 2023, doing so in a manner that was in the best interest of  
Lauderhill’s taxpayers, employees, residents, and businesses; the idea of the City  
not having a sufficient reserve, and being in the middle of the hurricane season, in  
light of what transpired on the Florida west coast in 2022, and there was a real  
probability of the present hurricane season being a very active one. She was  
deeply committed to the City’s current trajectory, and the City having been able to  
reduce its millage rate from 8.9 to 8.1, and the entire Commission gave its  
consensus that after the ARPA challenge was completed, staff would continue to  
reduce Lauderhill’s millage over the next three years to get it back down to 7 mils  
range. She reiterated being very uncomfortable making such a decision in a rush.  
Mayor Thurston opened the discussion to the public.  
Varion Harris, Lauderhill resident, mentioned the threat of an active hurricane  
season was real, but a few months prior the City experienced record flooding that  
affected City operations, so it was important for City administration to be good  
stewards in all ways to ensure the City was able to deal with such eventualities.  
Madeline Noel, Lauderhill resident, thanked Vice Mayor S. Martin for engaging  
everyone in such an important conversation, stating two items that were very  
important to here were safety, and the City’s youth and families. On the issue of  
safety, her home was once raided with guns fired, and one bullet penetrated her  
garage door and hit a wall, preventing it from hitting her child that was on the other  
side of the wall. She was unaware of what was taking place, as she was on a  
prayer line, until police officers came to her door to inform her of the raid on her  
home. Though she would love the City Commission to approve a reduction in  
taxes, it could not come at the expense of the public’s safety. She resided very  
near to Lauderhill 6-12 school, and she witnessed the issues occurring in the area,  
and the City could not afford to reduce services to its youth, such as its athletic  
programs, and other amenities that engaged the youths; in light of the existing  
issues involving youths, they would only worsen if they no longer had those  
programs and amenities to occupy them. Ms. Noel said she could support a  
reduction in the tax rate, as long as it did not result in a reduction in the City’s ability  
to adequately provide public safety, and programs and amenities for youth and  
families. The community turnout at the recent peace walk in Lauderhill showed the  
high degree to which residents supported peace, so the City could not afford to  
retreat from that stance.  
Mayor Thurston received no further input from the public.  
Commissioner Grant sought clarification if the Commission approved the subject  
resolution, public safety might be affected, and City program services could be  
reduced.  
Mr. Hobbs clarified if the City Commission approved the subject resolution, it would  
be directing staff to expend all remaining ARPA dollars before the end of the current  
fiscal year. Additionally, if staff were to roll back the proposed tax rate by one mil  
which would be 7.199 mils, or go to the roll back rate of 7.35 mils, services would  
definitely be affected, and based on the numbers, it would include public safety. He  
noted if all departmental budgets were reduced to the 2022 numbers, with the  
exception of public safety, this would only save the City 1.6 million, and this  
included: Parks & Recreation programs, efficiencies in the Building Department,  
COU processes, etc., and the gap or budget deficit would be closer to six, seven,  
or eight million. Under no circumstances could staff do both without affecting  
services.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin sought to clarify the subject item was neither a tax or budget  
item; it was simply to spend remaining ARPA dollars to allow staff to do their due  
diligence, and provide courses of action at a later time, which might or might not  
include a tax reduction. He was not recommending a reduction of the millage rate  
to the roll back rate; he only wished to see some decrease, but never at the  
detriment of public safety; he never wanted to touch the salaries, etc. of police and  
fire services, nor would he ever ask for anything that would compromise the City’s  
first responders, and their ability to do their work.  
Mr. Hobbs remarked it would be a complicated process in which more than the next  
fiscal year had to be taken into consideration, as what was done in the present  
fiscal year affected the next fiscal year, and the years thereafter. As he suggested  
previously in prior meetings with Vice Mayor S. Martin that staff be allowed time to  
compile the numbers for different scenarios, but to put together a comprehensive  
analysis, including seeing what the City’s budget would look like over a five-year  
period took time if staff were to be as accurate as possible. Staff needed to gather  
information beyond the City, such as contacting the County, and the State, examine  
trends, all being done while in the course of doing normal day-to-day tasks, etc.,  
including finalizing the FY 2024 budget. Thus, the Commission was being asked to  
allow staff time over the summer break to do the subject analysis, as based on the  
analysis staff completed over the last several years, understanding the use of the  
ARPA dollars, and having the remaining ARPA funds, staff felt it was their  
professional opinion that it was in the City’s best interest to expend those dollars in  
the manner detailed in the City Manager’s proposed budget for FY 2024.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin said he made his request for the five-year budget analysis  
some six months prior, and the subject resolution should act as an impetus to get  
that work completed, and submitted to the Commission, so they could make a  
decision.  
Mayor Thurston asked if the item could be tabled to allow staff to present their  
findings, etc. at the Commission’s next meeting in August 2023.  
City Manager Giles-Smith supported the Commission tabling the item.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin sought clarification the ARPA dollars could be obligated,  
though not necessarily spent in FY 2023, and this would meet the intent of how the  
dollars were spent.  
Mr. Hobbs responded the City’s grant specialist was the best person to answer the  
question, and she was not present at the meeting. He stressed the main issue was  
what would be the impact of spending all the ARPA dollars in the manner Vice  
Mayor S. Martin advocated; staff and the Commission discussed the expenditure of  
the ARPA dollars for the last three or four years, and, in general, the Commission  
accepted staff’s presentations on the best ways to use those dollars. It was  
possible to spend the $9 million remaining ARPA dollars, but it was the impact of  
doing so that should be the focus for FY 2024, and for this to be determined, his  
staff needed more time.  
Vice Mayor S. Martin withdrew his motion for approval.  
Commissioner L. Martin commented, in light of the July 11, 2023, budget workshop,  
at which some date-certain matters would be discussed, he wished to ensure staff  
did not blur those lines, so the necessary research regarding the possibility of  
expending the ARPA dollars by the end of the current fiscal year, and the impact  
was vital for the Commission to know as soon as possible.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner L.  
Martin, that this Resolution be tabled. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
8.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-172: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF  
LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA INDICATING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE  
CITY TO ISSUE ITS TAX-EXEMPT WATER AND SEWER REVENUE  
BONDS TO FINANCE CERTAIN COSTS OF ACQUISITION,  
CONSTRUCTION, EQUIPPING AND INSTALLATION OF VARIOUS  
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY’S WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM AND  
TO USE A PORTION OF THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH BONDS TO  
REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES PAID OR INCURRED PRIOR TO THE  
DATE OF ISSUANCE THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE  
DATE.  
Commissioner Dunn mentioned about a month ago a resident sent her a video of  
her sewage backing up in her yard, and coming out in an area where children  
played; she understood the City’s infrastructure was aging, so she wished the City  
Manager and/or her staff to provide an explanation on what the subject item was.  
Mr. Hobbs replied, currently, the City had a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that  
included over $70 million of planned improvements to the City’s water and sewer  
systems, including the water plant. Of the $70 million, City administration proposed  
the City do a bond or float a revenue bond for $30 million of the $70 million, and  
based on the CIP, his staff and he were working with the City’s utility professionals,  
Utilities Director Herb Johnson, and Public Works Director/City Engineer Martin  
Carla, along with outside professionals, such as former fire chief, Marc Celetti, and  
others, a number of projects were identified that needed immediate attention, and  
they amounted to about $30 million. He explained the proposed item was a  
reimbursement resolution to allow the City to move forward on those projects, as  
the bonds could not be issued as fast as some of the projects needed to be funded.  
Approving the resolution would allow staff to move forward with some of the  
projects, while the City went through the bonds issuance process; the bonds were  
unlikely to be issued before the second quarter of FY 2024. He said staff would  
have more discussion with the Commission on what the projects entailed at the  
July 11, 2023, budget workshop when they discussed the capital budget for the  
Utilities Department. For clarification, there were two ways the City paid for its  
capital improvements: one was considered the pay-as-you go method, which  
meant the City covered the project costs with current revenues, but this allowed the  
City to make incremental improvements; the other method was via bond financing,  
and this allowed the City to accumulate a large sum of money at once to make  
more improvements at the same time, while the residents who benefited from such  
improvements paid for them over time, such as in the case of the proposed $30  
million bond, the residents would pay this off over the next 25 to 30 years, the useful  
life of the assets. The latter was the more efficient way to make improvements, so  
the individuals who benefited from the improvements would pay for them while  
using them, rather than the piecemeal method. Mr. Hobbs stated, regarding the tax  
exempt piece, as the City was a government, and the dollars were being made to  
make approved improvements, for the persons who purchased the bonds, this was  
considered tax-free income for them. The City previously issued bonds that were  
taxable, such as the City issuing a bond for a private partnership or benefited a  
private party, this was considered a taxable issue, but where the bonds were used  
to make infrastructure improvements, the issued bond was considered nontaxable,  
so the individuals purchasing the bond had the benefit of earning on the bond  
without those earnings being taxable.  
City Attorney Rosenberg clarified, for bonds to be nontaxable, they had to be issued  
for a nonpublic purpose.  
Commissioner Dunn thanked staff, stating she wished the item discussed so the  
community understood the City had a plan in place to improve Lauderhill’s  
infrastructure, particularly with regard to water and sewage. Additionally, she  
wished to highlight there was a plan in place that the City was looking at to remedy  
the situation as soon as possible. Those who chose to purchase such bonds  
could, potentially, do so as a tax free investment.  
Mr. Hobbs affirmed this to be the case.  
Commissioner Grant asked about the Maple Run community, if they were included  
in the infrastructure improvement plans.  
Mr. Hobbs answered yes.  
City Manager Giles-Smith believed the infrastructure improvements in the Maple  
Run area was budgeted at over $1.6 million, of which the City would cover 50  
percent.  
Commissioner Grant sought clarity on the residents paying for the infrastructure  
improvements over time.  
Mr. Hobbs explained the funding source was a revenue bond, and the City’s portion  
would be repaid via utilities revenue.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Commissioner D.  
Grant, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
4 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, and  
Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
Off Dais:  
1 - Vice Mayor S. Martin  
XI QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
City Attorney Rosenberg swore in all persons wishing to speak on quasi-judicial  
items 18 and 20.  
20.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-184:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA APPROVING, SUBJECT TO  
CONDITIONS, THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION  
SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT, PROSPECT REAL ESTATE GROUP, LLC  
ON BEHALF OF PARABENS GROUP LLC, PROPERTY OWNER, FOR  
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED MIXED-USE MULTI-FAMILY  
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT INCLUSIVE OF  
265 DWELLING UNITS AND 10,000± SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL  
SPACE ON  
COMMERCIAL (CG) ZONING DISTRICT, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS  
COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD SHOPPES NO 1 109-28 B LOTS  
8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS  
A
6.43 ± ACRE VACANT SITE IN THE GENERAL  
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 109, PAGE 28, PUBLIC RECORDS OF  
BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 8456 -  
8458 W. COMMERCIAL BLVD, LAUDERHILL, FL 33351; PROVIDING  
FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Attachments:  
Commissioner L. Martin wished to know what City staff’s recommendations were.  
Acting Planning & Zoning (P&Z) Director Molly Howson replied City staff  
recommended approval of the application; the final page of the Development  
Review Report showed staff recommended conditions associated with their  
approval.  
Mayor Thurston questioned if the applicant expressed a willingness to comply with  
staff’s conditions.  
Ms. Howson affirmed the applicant was familiar with all the conditions of approval,  
and indicated they would comply accordingly. The conditions for approval were  
listed under the title: Recommended Actions: 1) the applicant was subject to any  
preexisting dedications, restrictions, covenants, and easements that ran with the  
land; 2) the site plan was reviewed and approved by the Development Review  
Committee (DRC), then on July 5, 2023, the P&Z Board approved the application,  
and recommended its being forwarded to the City Commission for final approval; 3)  
the applicant should satisfy the outstanding P&Z comments pertaining to the  
modification of the rooftop amenity, and pool deck, and staff might require the  
applicant to resubmit to the DRC for modifications to the approved site plan.  
City Attorney Rosenberg swore in Ms. Howson.  
Ms. Howson continued as follows: regarding condition three, the DRC approved the  
pool deck at a larger size, and staff asked, based on the applicant’s request to  
reduce the size of the pool for good structural engineering purposes, that they be  
allowed to see the amenities the applicant intended to install to replace what was  
previously a very large pool to just a large pool. Staff was pleased with the  
progress of the project with regard to the reconfiguring of the amenity deck, wishing  
to reserve the option to bring the matter back before the DRC. Condition 4) the  
applicant should satisfy the outstanding engineering comments in relation to an  
upgraded lift station to serve the development, setting a timeline for the force mains  
to be approved by the City engineer; 5) the applicant had to satisfy the outstanding  
fire comments in relation to the fire hydrant locations to serve the developments,  
and for them to be approved by the fire marshal; 6) the property owner should  
provide for adequate maintenance of the landscaping, right of ways, water body  
areas, swale areas, and provide maintenance agreements that would be reviewed  
by the City’s legal staff. This condition was very specifically targeted towards the  
northern side of the canal that fell on the reverse of the property wall associated  
with the site. Condition 7) the applicant had to satisfy the Land Development  
Regulation (LDR) requirements providing for public art; 8) the applicant should  
provide the City sufficient evidence of traffic approval from Broward County, the  
entity governing the West Commercial Boulevard corridor, prior to the issuance of  
the building permit; 9) the applicant must provide sufficient evidence of a declaration  
of covenant associated with lot parcel folio #494116080180 to memorialize the  
restriction related to the acreage already assigned to residential dwelling units, and  
not being eligible to be included in calculations for future residential development on  
the corridor. She stated the applicant already responded to this condition, but DRC  
staff and the City Attorney had yet to vet the applicant’s response.  
City Attorney Rosenberg added, at the P&Z Board meeting, Board member Bob  
Schankweiler gave a list of 13 specific landscape requirements the applicant  
agreed to satisfy, asking Ms. Howson to incorporate the list into the conditions of  
approval. She would provide a copy of the list to the City Clerk for the record.  
Ms. Howson concurred, stating condition 10 pertained to the landscape comments  
that emerged when the P&Z Board approved the application with conditions.  
Commissioner Dunn understood it was still earlier in the process, but it was  
important to her for development in the Lauderhill community was done in such a  
way that created a win/win situation for all concerned. She asked the applicant to  
voice their thoughts on making sure that, as they moved forward in the process,  
opportunities for hiring local were acted on, that the applicant did business with  
Lauderhill businesses, and should the process move forward, that the applicant  
would be good corporate citizens with the City of Lauderhill.  
Hope Calhoun, the applicant’s representative, mentioned the subject project had  
been going on for a considerable time, so there was a significant amount of  
information contained in the backup. With regard to local participation, the applicant  
was willing to work with the appropriate City department to ensure local vendors,  
businesses, residents, etc. were able to apply for the various services and  
positions. She said the applicant could give no guarantees of hiring everyone, but  
qualified businesses or individuals would be considered.  
A motion was made by Commissioner L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S.Martin, seconded by Mayor K.Thurston, that  
agenda item 18, related to Resolution No. 23r-07-182, be heard next on the  
agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
18.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-182:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA GRANTING GTG CARE, LLC  
A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE DEVELOPMENT ORDER, SUBJECT TO  
CONDITIONS, TO ALLOW IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG),  
ZONING DISTRICT AN OFFICE, MEDICAL, WITH PRESCRIBED  
PEDIATRIC EXTENDED CARE (“PPEC”) USE IN A 20,608 SQ. FT. AND  
2,779 SQ. FT SQUARE FEET UNIT WITHIN A 49,630 SQUARE FEET  
SITE LOCATED AT 3625 W. BROWARD BLVD AS LEGALLY  
DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Commissioner Dunn wished to hear from the applicant regarding the vision and  
intent for their business, particularly with regard to corporate social responsibility.  
Robert Kidd, the applicant, stated he was the owner of Glory To God care, currently  
the largest provider in Miami at present. He set out with a mission six years ago, as  
he saw the need for better care when it came to medically fragile children in Miami,  
where facilities appeared to be doing just the basics for such children, as most of  
them were nonverbal. Their facilities were staffed by nurses, therapists, and they  
now had about 75 employees; they were governed by the State of Florida’s Agency  
for Health Care Administration (AHCA). He said his staff and he poured all their  
energies into working with children in need of these services, and, currently, they  
had children traveling from Fort Lauderdale to use the cutting-edge equipment in  
their facility; thus, he had to send his buses everyday to Fort Lauderdale to bring  
children to his Miami facility. Parents repeatedly asked him to open a facility in the  
Broward area, and his realtor looked at possible spaces for them to open another  
facility, and their goal was to purchase the subject building, so they might continue  
the mission they began in Miami at a City of Lauderhill location. Mr. Kidd believed  
the population surrounding the subject site could benefit greatly, not only their  
children, but via the employment of nurses, aides, as well as behavioral, physical,  
occupational, and speech therapists, along with other forms of staffing required to  
run the proposed facility, for which he anticipated hiring about 100 employees; they  
were committed to hiring locally where possible.  
Commissioner Dunn wondered how many children Mr. Kidd anticipated serving at  
the Lauderhill location.  
Mr. Kidd replied the State determined the capacity; in his current Miami facility, they  
were allowed a capacity of 150 children; the building in Lauderhill was twice that of  
the Miami building, but they had a self-imposed capacity of 80 children, as they  
focused on quality versus quantity.  
Commissioner Dunn inquired as to the geographical location of the site.  
Ms. Howson stated the site was located at 3625 Broward Boulevard, which was  
immediately east of NW 38th Avenue; the site used to be the 123 Lump Sum  
building, which consisted of two stories; another small building was located on the  
immediately adjacent parcel, and Mr. Kidd proposed purchasing both properties.  
Commissioner Dunn believed the need for quality pediatric care on that side of the  
City was great, thanking Mr. Kidd for seeking to bring his services to Lauderhill.  
Commissioner L. Martin echoed the great need for such services in the area,  
asking Mr. Kidd to remember to invite members of the Commission to the grand  
opening of the facility, so they could do a walk through of the facility, and gain a  
better understanding of the services being offered.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Commissioner L.  
Martin, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
VIII  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - FIRST READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
IX  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - SECOND READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
1.  
ORDINANCE NO. 23O-06-110: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY  
CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION; ARTICLE X,  
COMMUNITY AND BUDGET ADVISORY BOARD TO MODIFY THE  
GEOGRAPHIC ZONE MAP TO CONSIST OF SEVEN (7) ZONES;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED  
BY  
COMMISSIONER LAWRENCE "JABBOW" MARTIN AND VICE MAYOR  
SARAI "RAY" MARTIN).  
Attachments:  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
2.  
ORDINANCE NO. 23O-06-116 : AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF  
LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL CODE  
OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE II,  
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, DIVISION 3, RETIREMENT, PART 4.  
SENIOR MANAGEMENT PENSION PLAN AND TRUST FUND TO  
AMEND  
THE  
CONFIDENTIAL  
AND  
MANAGERIAL  
EMPLOYEE  
DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN; AMENDING SECTION 2-88.7,  
VESTING AND TERMINATION; PURCHASE OF PRIOR COVERED  
SERVICE; AMENDING SECTION 2-88.15, DEFERRED RETIREMENT  
OPTION PLAN TO CLARIFY THE CITY POSITIONS THAT MAY REMAIN  
IN EMPLOYMENT AT THE CONCLUSION OF DROP PARTICIPATION;  
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
3.  
ORDINANCE NO. 23O-06-117: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL AMENDING THE CODE  
OF  
ORDINANCES,  
CHAPTER  
UNSIGHTLY  
10,  
GARBAGE  
AND  
TRASH/UNSANITARY  
AND  
CONDITIONS/ABANDONED  
REAL PROPERTY; ARTICLE II, RECYCLABLE WASTE, SECTION 10-22,  
FEES TO UPDATE THE FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
4.  
ORDINANCE NO. 23O-06-118: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING  
A
SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 IN THE  
TOTAL  
ADJUSTMENTS  
ACCOUNTS;  
AMOUNT  
OF  
$389,280.00;  
VARIOUS  
REFLECTING  
AND  
CODE  
APPROPRIATE  
EXPENDITURE  
TO  
VARIOUS  
REVENUE  
PROVIDING  
BUDGET  
NUMBERS;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
X RESOLUTIONS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
5.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-169:  
A
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE  
CHANGE ORDER TO THE SALTZ MICHELSON FOR THE INCREASED  
SCOPE OF WORK AND UPDATING SITE LIGHTING TO THE WOLK  
PARK G.O. BOND PROJECT  
;
AUTHORIZING PAYMENT IN THE  
AMOUNT OF $12,700.00 FROM G.O. BOND FUNDING; PROVIDING  
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER,  
DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
6.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-170:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL AWARDING THE BID TO  
PROSOUND + VIDEO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RFP 2023-034 TO  
PROVIDE SUPPORT, DESIGN AND ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR  
THE LPAC AUDIO SYSTEM.; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT IN AN  
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $500,000.00 FROM THE APPROPRIATE  
BUDGET  
CODE;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
7.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-171: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF  
LAUDERHILL DECLARING TRUCK TO BE SURPLUS AND  
APPROVING ITS DONATION TO THE LAUDERHILL HOUSING  
A
AUTHORITY (LHA) IN AN "AS IS" CONDITION WITH NO GUARANTEE  
OR WARRANTY FOR USE TO PERFORM COMMERCIAL INSPECTION  
SERVICES  
PURSUANT  
TO  
CITY  
CODE  
SECTION 2-143(b)(4);  
(REQUESTED BY CITY  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
9.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-173:  
A
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE  
RENEWAL OF THE CONTRACT WITH AMERIFLEX TO PROVIDE  
ADMINISTRATION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL'S MEDICAL  
FLEXIBLE  
SPENDING  
ACCOUNT  
AND  
DEPENDENT  
CARE  
SPENDING ACCOUNT UNDER THE SECTION 125 FLEXIBLE BENEFIT  
PROGRAM FOR ALL CITY EMPLOYEES AT "NO CHARGE" FOR A ONE  
YEAR  
TERM  
BEGINNING  
OCTOBER  
1,  
2023 AND  
ENDING  
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
10.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-174:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL ACCEPTING THE  
UTILITIES EASEMENT DEDICATION AND BILL OF SALE FROM  
BRIGHTSTAR CREDIT UNION FOR A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED  
1593 N.W. 40TH AVENUE, LAUDERHILL FLORIDA 33313 FOR WATER  
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS RIGHTS, ACCESS AND  
MAINTENANCE;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
11.  
RESOLUTION NO.23R-07-175:  
LAUDERHILL APPROVING  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF  
THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES  
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL AND VARIOUS  
RED CROSS WATER SAFETY SWIM INSTRUCTORS TO PROVIDE  
SWIM LESSON PROGRAMMING AT DESIGNATED PARKS AND  
RECREATION FACILITIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY; PROVIDING  
TERMS, CONDITIONS AND FEES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE  
DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
12.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-176:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE NINTH  
AMENDED ANNUAL CALENDAR OF CITY HOSTED SPECIAL EVENTS  
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
13.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-177:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
APPOINTMENT OF CHERYL LANGLEY BY THE CITY MANAGER TO  
SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE GENERAL EMPLOYEE PENSION  
BOARD FOR THE TERM EXPIRING JUNE 2025; PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER DESORAE  
GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
14.  
RESOLUTION NO 23R-07-178:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT  
(CDBG) FOURTH YEAR ACTION PLAN (2023-2024); AUTHORIZING THE  
CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY  
DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY HUD; PROVIDING  
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER,  
DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
15.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-179:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
APPOINTMENT OF KAREN LUE BY THE LAUDERHILL EDUCATIONAL  
ADVISORY BOARD ITSELF TO SERVE AS FIRST ALTERNATE  
MEMBER OF THE BOARD FOR THE REMAINDER OF  
A
TERM  
EXPIRING NOVEMBER 2024; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
16.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-180:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
REMOVAL  
OF  
VARIOUS  
ALTERNATE  
MEMBERS  
OF  
THE  
LAUDERHILL  
CODE  
ENFORCEMENT  
BOARD WHICH  
WERE  
APPOINTED BY VARIOUS COMMISSIONERS DUE TO LACK OF  
ATTENDANCE AT SUCCESSIVE BOARD MEETINGS; PROVIDING  
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
17A.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-185:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA URGING THE FLORIDA  
LEGISLATURE TO EXPLORE AVAILABLE FUNDING SOURCES AND  
THE FEASIBILITY OF CREATING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDED  
LOW INTEREST LOAN PROGRAM IN COLLABORATION WITH  
PARTICIPATING  
PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN EMERGENCY AND  
NEED-BASED CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS AND OWNERS  
REQUIRING EMERGENCY STRUCTURAL REPAIRS AS A RESULT OF  
30-YEAR RECERTIFICATION INSPECTION OR AN EQUIVALENT  
LENDING  
AND  
FINANCIAL  
INSTITUTIONS  
TO  
A
RECERTIFICATION PROCESS IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH  
FLORIDA SENATE BILL (SB) 154 (CHAPTER LAW 2023-203) AND  
SUBSEQUENT RECERTIFICATION PROCESSES; PROVIDING FOR  
THE ADOPTION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO  
THE  
CITY  
CLERK;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER LAWRENCE “JABBOW” MARTIN).  
Commissioner L. Martin asked the City Attorney to explain the aim of the resolutions  
under items 17A and 17B, noting the City of Lauderhill sought to join the efforts of  
other cities that proposed similar resolutions; the request was to the County and the  
State to look for resources to help local residents in need.  
City Attorney Rosenberg explained, in the past legislative session, Senate Bill 154,  
and House Bill 1395 were two items that moved forward, reminding the  
Commission they were previously known as the milestone inspection bills. The  
bills set forth certain requirements for buildings at their 30-year mark had to have  
certain structural inspections done, including setting aside a certain amount of  
dollars in the budget reserves for this purpose. She indicated by the time the final  
version of the bill passed, there were some modifications as to what the reserve  
requirements were; initially, the bill recommending mandating that if a study showed  
structural damage, sufficient funds must be set aside to meet those repairs; with  
the version that passed, it said the reserve funds set aside would depend on if the  
useful life of the item exceeded 25 years or not, and other determinations would be  
made based on the bill. One of the items in the bill allowed that for budgets adopted  
after December 31, 2024, associations could not approve a budget that contained  
no reserves, or reserves less than required in that session, the key language being:  
… unless there was an alternative method of funding available. Ms. Rosenberg  
commented both resolutions were passed in similar forms by other cities; 17A  
requested the Florida Legislature find alternate funding sources to help those  
reserve budgets, and 17B made the same request of Broward County. She said  
the aim was find additional funding sources to help provide low-interest loan  
programs for specific individuals and/or condominiums to meet those needs.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner L.  
Martin, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
17B.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-186:  
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA URGING THE BROWARD  
COUNTY COMMISSION TO EXPLORE AVAILABLE FUNDING  
SOURCES AND THE FEASIBILITY OF CREATING A COUNTY-WIDE  
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE PUBLIC  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
FUNDING STRUCTURE TO FUND LOW INTEREST LOAN PROGRAM IN  
COLLABORATION WITH PARTICIPATING LENDING AND FINANCIAL  
INSTITUTIONS TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN  
EMERGENCY  
AND  
NEED-BASED  
CONDOMINIUM  
ASSOCIATIONS  
AND OWNERS REQUIRING EMERGENCY STRUCTURAL REPAIRS AS  
A RESULT OF A 30-YEAR RECERTIFICATION INSPECTION OR AN  
EQUIVALENT  
ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA SENATE BILL 154 (CHAPTER LAW  
2023-203), AND SUBSEQUENT RECERTIFICATION PROCESSES;  
RECERTIFICATION  
PROCESS  
IN  
SUBSTANTIAL  
PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR  
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CITY CLERK; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED  
BY  
CITY  
COMMISSIONER  
LAWRENCE  
"JABBOW" MARTIN).  
Attachments:  
A motion was made by Commissioner L. Martin, seconded by Vice Mayor S.  
Martin, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Commissioner L. Martin, Vice  
Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
17C.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-195:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL WAIVING COMPETITIVE  
BIDDING; AUTHORIZING THE USE OF A COOPERATIVE PURCHASE  
BASED  
UPON  
THE  
STATE  
OF  
FLORIDA  
CONTRACT  
#46151500-NASPO-21-ACS (NASPO MASTER AGREEMENT #164713)  
TO PURCHASE RIFLE PLATES FROM GL DISTRIBUTOR, WHO IS THE  
SOLE SOURCE DISTRIBUTOR FOR GH ARMOR SYSTEMS FOR LAW  
ENFORCEMENT BODY ARMOR; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT FROM  
BUDGET CODE NUMBER 305-321-06512 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO  
EXCEED $155,000.00; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
XI QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
19.  
RESOLUTION NO. 23R-07-183:  
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA GRANTING PRIMARY CARE  
DENTAL PARTNERS, P.A. SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
A
DEVELOPMENT ORDER, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, TO ALLOW IN  
THE GENERAL COMMERICAL (CG), ZONING DISTRICT AN OFFICE,  
MEDICAL, DENTAL, WITH CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE PROVIDER IN  
A
±
1,604 SQUARE FEET SITE LOCATED AT 5950 W. OAKLAND  
PARK BLVD AS LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
XII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, FIRST READING  
XIII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, SECOND READING  
XIV UNFINISHED BUSINESS  
XV OLD BUSINESS  
XVI NEW BUSINESS  
XVII  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY  
BEFORE ADJOURNMENT  
Commissioner L. Martin mentioned the following: YEV Summer Camp with the  
City’s children was always a fun time; the walking program at West Wind Park the  
previous weekend; he wished Ms. Gibbons in West Ken Lark happy 85th birthday;  
everyone was urged to share information about the BRCA Strong free  
mammogram event coming up on July 15, 2023, for which there were some online  
registration requirements; Coaches and Volunteers cookout event on July 23, 2023,  
to which all members of the Commission were invited to celebrate, and give back to  
the coaches and volunteers throughout the City; on August 6, 2023, the Sweet  
Jamaica Independence Festival would take place in the old Kmart parking lot  
outside the Lauderhill Performing Arts Center (LPAC), and tickets were on sale.  
City Manager Giles-Smith remarked on it being good to see all the graduates going  
on to college, particularly two young ladies going to the University of Florida.  
XVIII ADJOURNMENT - 9:48 PM