City of Lauderhill  
City Commission Chambers at City Hall  
5581 W. Oakland Park Blvd.  
Lauderhill, FL, 33313  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Monday, February 24, 2025  
6:00 PM  
City Commission Chambers  
City Commission Meeting  
LAUDERHILL CITY COMMISSION  
Mayor Denise D. Grant  
Vice Mayor Sarai "Ray" Martin  
Commissioner Richard Campbell  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn  
Commissioner John T. Hodgson  
Kennie Hobbs, Interim City Manager  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
Hans Ottinot, Interim City Attorney  
I CALL TO ORDER  
Mayor Grant called to order the Regular City Commission Meeting at 6:00 PM.  
II ROLL CALL  
5 -  
Present:  
Commissioner Richard R. Campbell,Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn,Commissioner  
John T. Hodgson,Vice Mayor Sarai Martin, and Mayor Denise D. Grant  
ALSO PRESENT:  
Kennie Hobbs, Jr., Interim City Manager  
Hans Ottinot, Interim City Attorney  
Constance Stanley, Police Chief  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
III  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (AND CITY MANAGER RESPONSES TO  
THE PUBLIC, IF THE TIME PERMITS DURING THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING OF  
THE CITY COMMISSION)  
IV ADJOURNMENT (NO LATER THAN 6:30 PM)  
I CALL TO ORDER OF REGULAR MEETING  
II HOUSEKEEPING  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner R.  
Campbell, to ACCEPT the Final-Revised Version of the City Commission Meeting  
Agenda for February 24, 2025. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
III PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG FOLLOWED BY GOOD AND WELFARE  
IV CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner R.  
Campbell, that this Consent Agenda was approved. The motion carried by the  
following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
V APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
A.  
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR NOVEMBER 25,  
2024.  
These Minutes were approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
B.  
C.  
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR DECEMBER 9,  
2024.  
These Minutes were approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
MINUTES OF THE CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR JANUARY 27,  
2025.  
These Minutes were approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
VI PROCLAMATIONS / COMMENDATIONS (10 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
ITEM REMOVED  
VII PRESENTATIONS (15 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
A.  
A.  
B.  
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SIGNING PRESENTATION (REQUESTED  
BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER KENNIE HOBBS).  
A
PRESENTATION TO DISCUSS TALLAHASSEE ADVOCACY TRIP  
AND APPROPRIATION REQUESTS (REQUESTED BY MAYOR DENISE  
D. GRANT).  
VIII  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - FIRST READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
1.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-02-106: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, APPROVING  
AN INTERDEPARTMENTAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT  
OF $1,143,327 AND  
A
CAPITAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE  
AMOUNT OF $243,024 AND A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION IN  
THE AMOUNT OF $4,760,919 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 REFLECTING  
APPROPRIATE  
ADJUSTMENTS  
TO  
VARIOUS  
REVENUE  
AND  
EXPENDITURE ACCOUNTS AS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED IN THE  
BREAKDOWN IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $6,147,269; PROVIDING  
VARIOUS BUDGET CODE NUMBERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER,  
KENNIE HOBBS, JR).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda on first reading to the City  
Commission Meeting, due back on 03/31/2025. (See Consideration of Consent  
Agenda for vote tally.)  
2.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-02-107:  
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING  
THE CITY’S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BY AMENDING  
ARTICLE III, ENTITLED “ZONING DISTRICTS,” SECTION 5.30A  
ENTITLED “PHARMACY” BY MODIFYING STANDARDS; AMENDING  
SECTION 5.50, ENTITLED “MEDICAL MARIJUANA HEALTH CARE  
ESTABLISHMENT”  
ESTABLISHMENTS”  
AND  
AND  
RENAMING  
ESTABLISHING  
DISPENSING  
IT  
“MEDICAL  
STANDARDS  
CENTERS;  
CLASSIFICATIONS”  
MEDICAL  
CENTERS;  
MARIJUANA  
FOR  
AMENDING  
MEDICAL  
MARIJUANA  
A, ENTITLED  
DEFINITIONS  
AND DISPENSING  
SCHEDULE  
CLARIFYING  
“LAND  
USE  
BY  
FOR  
MARIJUANA  
AMENDING  
ESTABLISHMENTS  
SCHEDULE B, ENTITLED “ALLOWABLE USES,” SCHEDULE B-2,  
ENTITLED “USES IN NON-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS” TO PROVIDE  
ZONING  
DISPENSING  
DISTRICT  
REGULATIONS  
FOR  
MEDICAL  
FOR  
MARIJUANA  
CONFLICTS,  
CENTERS;  
PROVIDING  
SEVERABILITY, AND CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Commissioner Dunn sought clarification as to the areas in which staff proposed  
placing the dispensaries, why they should be allowed, and how many would be  
allowed in Lauderhill should the Commission approve the subject ordinance.  
Development Services Director Daniel Keester-O’Mills replied, in relation to the  
subject use, any changes to the City’s code of ordinances that were based off  
state statutes had to be consistent with pharmacy uses.  
Thus, the State  
Legislature ruled that if a city or municipality adopted via its commission to allow  
medical marijuana dispensaries, they had to be regulated in the same manner  
as pharmacies.  
The applicant sought to add marijuana dispensaries to the  
City’s list of permitted uses, and after staff’s evaluation of that request, the  
proposed resolution before the Commission was aligning that use, with some  
tweaks, to be regulated like pharmacies.  
He said pharmacies were currently  
permitted in the City in the CG and CC zoning districts, which covered most of  
Lauderhill’s commercial corridors; for example, along Pine Island Road,  
Commercial Boulevard, University Drive, Oakland Park Boulevard, Sunrise  
Boulevard. In the worst-case scenario, if a medical marijuana dispensary found  
land in each of those zoning districts, and spaced as permitted, one every  
quarter mile, the maximum number of such uses permitted in the City would be  
about 14.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills added, comparably, there were currently eight  
pharmacies in Lauderhill.  
Commissioner Dunn asked staff to share their findings as to the subject use in  
surrounding cities.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills affirmed he surveyed immediate neighboring cities:  
Lauderdale Lakes, Tamarac, Plantation, Sunrise, and Fort Lauderdale to  
discover their rules on medical marijuana dispensaries, and the number present  
in these cities. In Lauderdale Lakes and Plantation this was not a permitted  
use; there was one in Tamarac, but they were under a moratorium, meaning  
that city was putting a pause on allowing more of such uses, and evaluating the  
factors involving the use; no confirmation was given by his research on Sunrise,  
but based on his review of their land development regulations, it appeared it was  
a permitted use in a number of zoning districts, but there were no such uses in  
that city currently; and in Fort Lauderdale it was permitted as a conditional use,  
and there were three active in that city; their rules specified there could be only  
one such use per 40,000 residents within each of the five commission districts.  
He was unsure if the latter was before or after the State Legislatures ruling that  
pharmacies and medical marijuana facilities should be treated the same; thus,  
some existing facilities could have been grandfathered in after the legislation  
took effect; he would do more research.  
Commissioner Dunn observed that in 2018 the City Commission approved the  
subject use, and then in 2019 the Commission voted to ban the use, and, with  
the present application, it appeared the Commission was again being asked to  
reconsider the use.  
She asked Mayor Grant if, as she was a part of the  
Commission in 2019, she recalled why the Commission voted to ban the use.  
Mayor Grant thought staff needed to provide the Commission with more  
information, and more due diligence was needed to gather that information.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills confirmed he needed to go back to those minutes to  
determine the reason the Commission voted to ban the use in Lauderhill after  
approving it earlier.  
Commissioner Dunn commented that looking at the subject application through  
a public health lens, she recognized the clinical value that medical marijuana  
provided, and in her work experience, she particularly saw the benefit of medical  
marijuana’s use by cancer patients. Similarly, in her current work with clinics,  
she witnessed the benefit for persons suffering from anxiety, and facing certain  
mental challenges. Her concern was Lauderhill becoming a city in which there  
were numerous medical marijuana dispensaries, and if the Commission voted  
on the subject resolution as presented, she felt this would open the City up to  
having up to 14 such dispensaries. This was a concern to her in light of the  
Commission’s  
clear  
vision  
for  
Lauderhill’s  
commercial  
corridors.  
Commissioner Dunn mentioned coming across a study published in 2019 by a  
renowned research corporation that showed that young people living in  
neighborhoods in close proximity to medical marijuana dispensaries used  
marijuana more often, and had more positive views of using marijuana.  
Mayor Grant questioned why the language of the resolution was so broad, thus  
allowing the potential for 14 such dispensaries in Lauderhill.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills replied the applicant was responsible for the language in the  
proposed resolution; his staff and he only reviewed the language for  
consistency with state law and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, mirroring the  
rules with those that applied to pharmacies.  
He would follow up with the  
Commission as to how other surrounding cities were applying the States law  
with regard to the subject use.  
Mayor Grant asked about the process of someone acquiring medical marijuana  
at a medical marijuana dispensary.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills explained when the State approved the subject use, three  
types of permitted facilities were identified: medical marijuana treatment centers  
-
facilities where medical marijuana could be both grown and dispensed;  
medical marijuana healthcare establishments facilities where doctors  
-
prescribed medical marijuana, but state law prevented them dispensing it, as  
they had to operate separate from a retail dispensary; and medical marijuana  
dispensaries where persons with  
purchase medical marijuana.  
a
prescription from their doctor could  
Mayor Grant wished to know the minimum age to purchase medical marijuana.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills responded that the minimum age was 18 years old.  
Mayor Grant asked the exact location of the subject dispensary.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills replied that the applicant sought approval to open  
dispensary along State Road 7.  
a
Hope Calhoun, the applicant’s representative, stated the subject text  
amendment was not site specific; the amendment would be applied citywide to  
any entity wishing to open such dispensaries. She pointed out that though 14  
was the maximum number allowed, each applicant still had to through the Citys  
land development process, which meant they had to meet all the requirements  
established by the City’s code. She explained when the law was passed by the  
State in 2018 to allow medical marijuana, cities received numerous  
applications, and many stopped accepting such applications to prevent  
a
proliferation of such uses within their boundaries. Ms. Calhoun believed that  
until cities received applications, they did not enforce amendments for the use  
in their code in response to what they saw transpiring. She mentioned having a  
PowerPoint that showed the benefits of medical marijuana, which included  
health, and socioeconomic benefits; health benefits included: pain relief;  
reduced inflammation; controlled nausea and vomiting; appetite stimulation;  
reduction of anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); muscle spasm  
relief; improved sleep; reduction of ticks for persons with Tourettes Syndrome.  
Socioeconomic benefits included improved local revenue and job creation.  
If  
approved, her client would have to apply for a special exception for the subject  
use.  
Mayor Grant understood the amendment was not site specific, but she wished  
to know more about the types of measures the applicant planned to ensure the  
State and the City’s regulations were followed.  
Ms. Calhoun replied that security was always paramount at locations for the  
subject use, so this would be emphasized in the operations of the facility with  
regard to safety precautions, measures, etc.  
Mayor Grant stated she was 100 percent against recreational drugs, but she  
understood the benefits of medical marijuana, having done her own research,  
though she had no personal experience using it. However, with the myriad of  
illnesses in the world, if medical marijuana could decrease someone suffering  
from a medical condition, then she could support the subject use if it was taken  
properly. She sought clarification as to the measures that would be put in place  
to ensure safety, limiting access to underaged persons, and proper monitoring  
to ensure regulations were being followed.  
research on other cities with regard to the restrictions mentioned earlier, and  
what the City could do to ensure Lauderhill residents were protected. She  
Staff was asked to do additional  
reiterated not being against the use of medical marijuana, as there was  
constantly evolving research on the benefits of herbal remedies, but there  
needed to be sufficient restrictions in place to limit the number of dispensaries  
allowed in the City.  
Commissioner Campbell sought clarification if there were at least two reasons  
the City could deny the subject use that the State would accept that would not  
expose the City to lawsuits, particularly in light of the State requiring the subject  
use be treated in the same manner as pharmacies. Despite the availability of  
drugs to treat numerous illnesses, it was still up to patients and their doctors to  
determine what to use; the pharmaceutical industry allowed the legal use of  
thousands of drugs that had significant negative impacts on patients who used  
them. He noted, in a free market society, patients should not be denied the right  
to access what was deemed a legal drug by one or more elected officials  
because the latter’s morals dictated their objection to its use. It was important  
that the Commission not moralize or opine as to right or wrong with regard to  
the medical access and use of a legal drug by a patient.  
Commissioner Dunn sought clarification on the application as she saw an  
actual address, despite Ms. Calhoun stating the amendment was not site  
specific.  
Ms. Calhoun explained the address was only stated due to applications  
requiring a specific address; the subject text amendment was not site specific;  
though the backup stated a specific location, in order for the subject use to be  
permitted at that site, or anywhere in Lauderhill, the proposed text amendment  
was first necessary.  
Commissioner Dunn asked if the dispensary at the stated location would be a  
cash establishment.  
Ms. Calhoun believed, though not with absolute certainty, that it would not be a  
cash establishment.  
Commissioner Dunn remarked if any of the dispensaries ended up being cash  
establishments, it opened the potential for issues such as loitering, and other  
public safety concerns.  
While she recognized the clinical benefits of medical  
marijuana, it was prudent for the Commission, as policymakers, to set up  
allowing the subject use in a way that Lauderhill did not become a dumping  
ground for the use, the use did not become a public safety concern, and it did  
not expand into a community concern.  
Ms. Calhoun felt certain the safety of the patrons and residents of Lauderhill with  
regard to the subject use would be paramount, and this was for medical  
marijuana distribution only, so a prescription from a doctor was required to get  
the product.  
Commissioner Dunn desired additional research by staff as to what, for  
example, the City of Fort Lauderdale had done, how they were able to limit the  
number of establishments in their city. She had no wish to rush the vote on the  
subject matter.  
Vice Mayor Martin felt conflicted about how the ordinance was written.  
He  
understood that even if the Commission voted on the proposed amendment at  
the present meeting, there still had to be a second reading for it to take effect.  
Mr. Keester-O’Mills affirmed this to be the case, but he doubted there was  
sufficient time between the first and second reading, were the ordinance to  
pass at the present meeting, for his staff and he to conduct the kind of research  
and analysis the Commission requested.  
Vice Mayor Martin asked if there was a mandatory timeframe required between  
the first and second reading of an ordinance, or could the second reading take  
place whenever staff was ready.  
City Attorney Ottinot replied, based on the City’s process, when an ordinance  
was approved on first reading, the second reading usually took place at the next  
Commission meeting. However, the Commission had the authority to defer the  
second reading of an ordinance to a time certain of their choice.  
Ms. Calhoun pointed out that the City’s code of ordinances was a living,  
breathing document, so regardless of what was approved on first and second  
reading, the Commission could make further amendments as desired.  
City Attorney Ottinot noted if substantial changes took place between the first  
and second reading of the subject ordinance due to the data gathered from city  
staff’s research, under City law, the Commission might be required to redo the  
first reading.  
Commissioner Campbell commented that, despite the potential for 14  
applications coming to the City for the subject use, he would be more  
concerned if there were already, for example, ten such uses, with only four to  
go, but thus far there was only one such possible application, and every  
application was considered individually.  
Approving one did not mean an  
automatic approval of subsequent applications, which the Commission could  
approve or deny at their will; there were distance, and other limitations already in  
the City’s regulations that restricted the proliferation of such uses.  
Lawrence Martin, Lauderhill resident, disagreed that if the proposed amendment  
took effect as is that the Commission would have the ability to approve or deny  
ensuing applicants for the subject use after the first approval for the use was  
granted.  
He believed once one was approved, there would be 13 more  
applications in the first six months. Medical marijuana was big business, and  
people were positioning themselves for when the authorization for the use of  
recreational marijuana passed, likely in the near future; this was evidenced by  
the growth of the industry in other western cities, such as Seattle, and what it  
had one to their downtown areas.  
He was not against marijuana, but if  
Lauderhill was surrounded by several cities with larger populations that chose  
not to move aggressively, as the City Commission appeared to be considering  
doing, the question of why should be asked. As members of the Commission  
directed city staff to conduct more research on the matter in order to ensure the  
text amendment sufficiently protected the City, he wished to know why the  
Commission considered approval on first reading rather than tabling the matter  
to allow the requested research to take place. He urged the Commission to  
table the matter, allow staff time to research and analyze the information  
collected, and make text changes as necessary, rather than risk having to redo  
the first reading due to the need to make extensive changes resulting from  
staff’s research.  
Mr. Lawrence reminded the Commission that once the law  
was passed, they did not get to pick and choose to whom it should apply.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Vice Mayor S.  
Martin, that this Ordinance be tabled to the City Commission Meeting, due back  
on 4/14/2025. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
Mayor Grant understood public input was not usually permitted when an item  
was tabled, but she allowed public input on the above matter.  
Willie Mae Cooper, Lauderhill resident, and president of the West Ken Lark  
Homeowners’ Association (HOA), thanked the members of the Commission  
who approved tabling the previous agenda item. She expressed concerns with  
regard to permitting medical marijuana dispensaries in the Lauderhill  
community; they already had issues with lottery in her community, and people  
loitering at those stores. She had no wish for their community to become a  
dumping ground for such uses, so the elected officials were thanked for  
listening to residents’ concerns, as sometimes the Commission moved so  
quickly, and passed items without first listening to the heartbeat of the  
community.  
The Commission was elected by the residents, and their tax  
dollars paid the salaries of elected officials who worked for Lauderhill citizens,  
so the latter should be listened to.  
Varion Harris, Lauderhill resident, and president of United Lauderhill Community  
Association, asked if medical marijuana was considered  
substance.  
a
controlled  
City Attorney Ottinot answered, yes, under federal law marijuana was  
controlled substance.  
a
Mr. Harris questioned why the Commission sought to allow a use in Lauderhill  
that, if legal, could be dispensed at existing pharmacies in the City; if approved,  
the Commission would be sending the wrong message to Lauderhills youth.  
He asked if the distance limitation would not further limit the placement of the  
subject use in close proximity to residential uses, particularly in light of all the  
new residential development taking place along the 441 corridor. The presence  
of the subject use could deter new businesses coming to this area of the City.  
3.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-02-108:  
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING  
THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2,  
ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE II, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, DIVISION  
3, RETIREMENT, PART 2, GENERAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND,  
SECTION 2-63, RETIREMENT DATES AND BENEFITS; AMENDING  
SECTION 2-73, DEFERRED RETIREMENT OPTION PLAN; PROVIDING  
FOR  
CONFLICTS,  
CODIFICATION  
AND  
SEVERABILITY;  
AND  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda on first reading to the City  
Commission Meeting, due back on 03/31/2025. (See Consideration of Consent  
Agenda for vote tally.)  
IX  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - SECOND READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
4.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-02-104: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING  
THE CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 2, ENTITLED  
“ADMINISTRATION,” ARTICLE IV, ENTITLED “CITY COMMISSION,”  
SECTION 2-157 ENTITLED “AGENDA” TO REQUIRE SIMPLE  
A
MAJORITY TO CHANGE AN AGENDA’S ORDER OF BUSINESS;  
AMENDING SECTION 2-159 ENTITLED “ORDER OF BUSINESS” TO  
CHANGE THE ORDER OF BUSINESS AT REGULAR MEETINGS;  
AMENDING SECTION 2-160 ENTITLED “CONSENT AGENDA” TO  
ALLOW ITEMS TO BE APPROVED AS GROUPED WITHOUT  
A
SEPARATE TITLE READING; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,  
SEVERABILTY, AND CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER KENNIE  
HOBBS, JR.).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
X RESOLUTIONS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
5.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-35:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL AUTHORIZING THE  
DISPOSAL OF OBSOLETE, DAMAGED, INOPERABLE AND SURPLUS  
EQUIPMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND  
ENVIRONMENTAL  
SERVICES  
(DEES)  
IN  
THE  
MOST  
COST-EFFECTIVE AND FAVORABLE MANNER PURSUANT TO CITY  
CODE SECTION 2-143; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY INTERIM ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, SEAN  
HENDERSON) .  
Mr. Martin recalled discussion by the prior Commission regarding establishing a  
policy and/or lottery to transition the subject vehicles to Lauderhill residents in  
need.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs recalled the previous Commissions conversation,  
however none of the surplus vehicles staff was proposing for sale were  
operable; they were only good for parts, which he verified recently with the  
Public Works Director. The plan was for the subject items to go through the  
auction system, and they would be available to any member of the public. With  
regard to previous commission discussion, he did not believe anything further  
transpired.  
Mr. Martin asked that further consideration be given for future surplus items.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
6.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-36:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING AN  
“INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT  
EMERGENCY/NONGUARANTEED  
WITH BROWARD COUNTY FOR  
SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT  
BUILDING CODE SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE BROWARD  
COUNTY BUILDING CODE DIVISION OF THE RESILIENT  
ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT” FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL, PLAN  
REVIEW, PERMIT INSPECTIONS, CODE ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER  
SERVICES RELATED TO BUILDING; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO  
EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES; AND  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM  
CITY MANAGER KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Attachments:  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
7.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-38:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING GISELLE  
FORDE-MYERS BY VICE MAYOR SARAI “RAY” MARTIN AND  
MARGARET PAUL BY COMMISSIONER JOHN T. HODGSON TO  
SERVE AS MEMBERS OF THE EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD FOR  
THE REMAINDER OF THE UNEXPIRED FOUR (4) YEAR TERMS TO  
EXPIRE  
COMMISSIONER  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
NOVEMBER  
2028 OR  
WHICHEVER  
CONCURRENT  
OCCURS  
WITH  
FIRST;  
THE  
AND  
SEAT,  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
8.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-39:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING SEVERAL  
NEW MEMBERS TO THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD BY MAYOR  
DENISE D. GRANT AND COMMISSIONERS RICHARD CAMPBELL  
AND JOHN T. HODGSON FOR UNEXPIRED TERMS AS SET FORTH  
HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
9.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-40:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING BRENT  
LEWIS BY COMMISSIONER JOHN T. HODGSON TO SERVE AS A  
MEMBER OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FOR THE VACANT  
UNEXPIRED FOUR (4) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE NOVEMBER 2028 OR  
CONCURRENT WITH THE COMMISSIONER SEAT, WHICHEVER  
OCCURS FIRST; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
10.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02- 41:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING TO SERVE  
AS MEMBERS OF THE ART, CULTURAL, TOURISM BOARD MARIE  
HODGSON BY COMMISSIONER RICHARD CAMPBELL FOR THE  
VACANT UNEXPIRED FOUR (4) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE NOVEMBER  
2026 OR  
WHICHEVER  
CONCURRENT  
OCCURS  
WITH  
FIRST  
THE  
AND  
COMMISSIONER  
PAULA SCOTT  
SEAT,  
BY  
COMMISSIONER JOHN T. HODGSON FOR THE VACANT UNEXPIRED  
FOUR (4) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE NOVEMBER 2028 OR  
CONCURRENT WITH THE COMMISSIONER SEAT, WHICHEVER  
OCCURS FIRST; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
11.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-42:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING MICHELLE  
MCKOY BY COMMISSIONER JOHN T. HODGSON AND STEPHANIE  
WHITFIELD BY VICE MAYOR SARAI “RAY” MARTIN TO SERVE AS  
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE FOR THE VACANT  
UNEXPIRED FOUR (4) YEAR TERMS TO EXPIRE NOVEMBER 2028  
OR CONCURRENT WITH THE COMMISSIONER SEAT, WHICHEVER  
OCCURS FIRST; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
12.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-43:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING  
A
DONATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,500.00 TO THE BOYS AND GIRLS  
CLUB OF BROWARD COUNTY TO ASSIST WITH ITS CONSTRUCTION  
CAREER DAY FOR ITS YOUTH; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT FROM  
THE APPROPRIATE BUDGET CODE NUMBER; AND PROVIDING FOR  
AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER RICHARD  
CAMPBELL).  
Commissioner Campbell questioned if the presentation of items 12 and 13  
could be combined; that is, a three-minute presentation for item 12, and a  
six-minute presentation for item 13.  
Chris Gentile, Co-CEO of the Broward County Boys and Girls Club, stated each  
year they held a Construction Career Day in order to expose Browards youth to  
the trade industry; for 2025, this event would be held at the Lauderhill Boys and  
Girls Club on Saturday, March 15, 2025. They sought some support from the  
City to help with this program; they usually had about 200 teens in attendance,  
with about 15 to 17 career professionals running stations to expose youths to all  
aspects of the construction industry. The Boys and Girls Club sought to provide  
opportunities, and access to youths, so they could explore career opportunities  
for their future. He said they had a longstanding partnership with the City of  
Lauderhill where one of their busiest club was located; they saw over 200  
youths aged six to 18 every day, and they served over 2,200 children in Broward  
County in their 16 locations.  
The City’s support and sponsorship would be  
greatly appreciated, as the donation would go toward providing lunch to the  
youths, volunteers, and staff for the day. Mr. Gentile invited the members of the  
Commission to attend the event.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs asked if the event was only open to the children  
who attended the club in Lauderhill, or was it available to children throughout the  
community.  
Mr. Gentile stated the event was for the benefit of their members, but it was  
open to any young people who wished to attend.  
Lisa B, representative of the Voice of the Caribbean, stated they would be  
holding their Third Annual Jamaica International Music Awards (JIMA) & Gala  
Dinner, which she believed members of the Commission attended previously.  
This classy event promoted culture, and it was open to the public for the first  
time, so the community could see the rich, and diverse culture they shared; it  
was previously by invitation only. They put a lot of hard work and diligence into  
the event, and they sought the City’s support.  
An additional representative for Voice of the Caribbean said the JIMA would be  
held at Chateau Mar Golf Resort, Lauderhill, on Friday, February 28, 2025; the  
JIMA focused on the brand of Jamaican music, such as reggae, ska, dance hall,  
mento, etc., much of which carried over into hip-hop. The artists they would be  
honoring were those in whom they recognized value; they included: Sister  
Nancy, the first female dance hall artist, who paved the way for other notable  
female dance hall artists, and Nadine Sutherland. She stated the 2025 event  
was different from the two previous years in that there would also be a dinner,  
and they could continue to host the subject event in Lauderhill annually, bringing  
high quality entertainment, and revenue to the City.  
They hosted numerous  
events, and they wished to bring entertainment to Lauderhill that the City wished  
to be a part of, hence them seeking a partnership with the City that would  
advance culture.  
Mayor Grant opened the discussion to the public.  
Ms. Cooper expressed support for item 12, the donation to the Boys and Girls  
Club of Broward County.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner J.  
Hodgson, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
13.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-44 :  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
SPONSORSHIP TO THE JAMAICA INTERNATIONAL MUSIC AWARDS  
(JIMA) GALA DINNER IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $3,000 TO  
PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE, AND SAFETY OF THE  
COMMUNITY PURSUANT TO CITY CODE SECTION 2-2; PROVIDING  
FOR PAYMENT FROM THE APPROPRIATE BUDGET CODE NUMBER;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE.  
(REQUESTED  
BY  
COMMISSIONER RICHARD CAMPBELL)  
Mayor Grant opened the discussion to the public.  
Ms. Cooper questioned if there would be sufficient parking for the gala event, as  
she attended events at the subject venue and she noticed that the space for  
parking was inadequate.  
LisaB replied the venue’s ballroom held about 300 people; they were expecting  
about 150 to 200 attendees and they, too, attended a variety of larger events at  
the venue and observed no parking issues.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner J.  
Hodgson, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
14.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-45:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
RELEASE AND USAGE OF STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST  
FUNDS FOR DONATIONS TO THE GUARDIANS INVOLVED FOR  
TOMORROW (GIFT) YOUTH PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,350.00;  
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (REQUESTED BY  
INTERIM CITY MANAGER, KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Attachments:  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
14A.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-02-46:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AWARDING  
THE KEY TO THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL TO JAMAICA WOMEN OF  
FLORIDA IN RECOGNITION OF THE IMPACT ON WOMEN OF THE  
JAMAICAN COMMUNITY AND CARIBBEAN DIASPORA IN FLORIDA;  
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY  
MAYOR DENISE GRANT).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
XI QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
XII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, FIRST READING  
XIII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, SECOND READING  
15.  
ORDINANCE 25O-02-105: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION  
OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, GRANTING TO AIRPORT  
COMMERCE, LLC, A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A NEW FAST FOOD  
RESTAURANT WITH A DRIVE-THROUGH WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL  
GENERAL (CG) ZONING DISTRICT WHICH IS RELIEF FROM THE  
CITY’S LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARTICLE III, SECTION  
5.32.2.E, REQUIRING  
ANOTHER  
RESTAURANT;  
A
MINIMUM 1000 FEET DISTANCE FROM  
FREESTANDING FAST FOOD DRIVE-THROUGH  
SAID PROPERTY LOCATED ON AN  
IS  
APPROXIMATELY 4.8 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 5517-5577 WEST  
OAKLAND PARK BOULEVARD, LAUDERHILL;  
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
AND PROVIDING FOR  
As part of the Houskeeping, this Ordinance was tabled to the City Commission  
Meeting, due back on a date certain of 03/31/2025.  
XIV UNFINISHED BUSINESS  
XV OLD BUSINESS  
XVI NEW BUSINESS  
A.  
A
DISCUSSION OF CANCELLATION OF MARCH 17, 2025 CITY  
COMMISSION WORKSHOP.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs stated he needed to hold a special meeting in  
March, so the City Clerk polled the Commission for their availability for a special  
meeting on March 6. Additionally, members of the Commission were asked to  
communicate whether or not they would be attending Broward Days or the  
Florida League of Cities (FLC) Legislative Days event, so staff could determine  
if a quorum would be achieved for the March 17 workshop.  
Deputy City Clerk Nadia Chin stated she emailed the elected officials, asking  
about their availability for the March 6 meeting, to which three confirmed they  
would be available.  
Commissioner Dunn indicated she was not available for a March 6 meeting, as  
she had a business to run, and she scheduled her workdays to ensure she  
attended Commission meetings, asking if the March 17 workshop could be  
moved to March 24.  
Mayor Grant, and Commissioners Campbell and Hodgson stated they were  
available for a March 6, and Vice Mayor Martin stated he was available, though  
he was waiting on a call that might change that.  
Mayor Grant observed holding the workshop on March 17 meant the  
Commission would meet three consecutive Mondays; as at least three  
members of the Commission were available on March 6, the workshop could be  
moved to March 6.  
Commissioner Dunn felt it was not right if it was possible to change the  
workshop date to one on which all members of the Commission could attend; it  
was unfair for her to be penalized and forced to miss a meeting, when she  
would be going on City business on March 7.  
Mayor Grant indicated she was not available on March 24.  
Commissioner Dunn remarked other dates could be looked at; for example, she  
was available on March 20 or 27.  
She suggested the City Clerk poll the  
Commission for other dates than March 6 to give all commissioners the  
opportunity to be present.  
Mayor Grant commented, in her serving on the Commission for six years,  
special meetings, impromptu meetings, etc. were called, and the members of  
the Commission were asked to give their time to attend them. However, there  
were times when an elected official was not available to attend, but the meeting  
proceeded, simply because a quorum could be achieved without them.  
Commissioner Dunn wished it stated for the record that she did not believe it  
was necessary for the Commission to meet on March 6; there were times when  
an impromptu meeting was necessary, but this seemed to be another time  
when the decision was being made for the Commission to meet at a time when  
she was not available. She said it would hurt no one to find an alternate date to  
meet in March that worked for all members of the Commission.  
Commissioner Campbell stated it was almost impossible throughout the  
calendar year that there would not be times when one or two members of the  
City Commission could not attend a meeting, hence the rules for achieving a  
quorum. If the workshop were moved to March 24, he would not be available,  
as he was out of town for that entire week, but if there as a quorum of  
commissioners on that date, he had no issue with the meeting proceeding  
without him.  
A commissioner having to miss a meeting at which a quorum  
could be achieved by the attendance of other commissioners should not be  
taken as a personal slight by the absent commissioner. He noted there would  
be a quorum of the Commission if the meeting was held on March 6.  
Commissioner Dunn suggested sending Commission members a Doodle poll  
to find a date in March when all members were available.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs clarified staff’s request was regarding two meetings  
in March; one was for a special meeting with a limited agenda of one item, a  
contract amendment to the police station improvements that, without a timely  
approval, would push back the completion of the police station more than six  
weeks; staff was not asking for the workshop to take place on the same date as  
the special meeting.  
The second meeting for discussion was the March 17  
workshop, hence staff’s request to know which members of the Commission  
planned to attend Broward Days, etc. to determine if a quorum would be  
achieved.  
Commissioner Dunn stated she would not be attending Broward Days.  
Mayor Grant indicated she, too, would not be attending Broward Days.  
• There Was a City Commission consensus to hold a special Commission  
meeting on March 6, 2025; and not to cancel the March 17, 2025, workshop.  
Commissioner Dunn asked which members of the Commission would be going  
to Washington, D.C. for the National League of Cities Conference. She  
received responses from Commissioner Hodgson and Mayor Grant that they  
would be attending; Vice Mayor Martin said he would be out of town. She asked  
the same for the FLC event on March 25 and 26, to which she received no  
response.  
XVII  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY  
BEFORE ADJOURNMENT  
Commissioner Hodgson looked forward to the awards ceremony the coming  
Friday at the Chateau Mar Golf Resort, as stated earlier in the meeting,  
encouraging all members of the community to attend.  
Commissioner Dunn, using  
following:  
a
PowerPoint presentation, highlighted the  
• Lauderhill Shines Cohort 10 began; recognizing the members present  
• There were 20 people in Cohort 10, of which 55 percent were Lauderhill  
residents; the members came from a variety of industries  
• 70 percent of them had an existing business registered on Sunbiz, thus they  
were registered in the State of Florida, but only four, or 20 percent were  
registered in Broward County  
• None of the businesses were registered in Lauderhill, so this meant 20 new  
businesses coming to the City, of which 85 percent were women owned  
• Most of these businesses were in the startup phase  
• Vice Mayor Martin was thanked for attending the welcome reception where he  
spoke and inspired the business owners, as well as sharing his expertise on  
government contracting  
• Commissioner Hodgson was thanked for his words of encouragement in his  
video message.  
Vice Mayor Martin wished to invite his colleagues and the community to a food  
distribution event the coming Saturday at John Mullin Park, 10:00 a.m. to 1:00  
p.m.  
Commissioner Campbell sent a shoutout to his mother on her 90th birthday.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs mentioned he issued his first quarterly report to the  
Mayor and Commissioners, as well as to the City’s department directors; the  
report would be placed online on the City’s website, so it was available to the  
public.  
Mayor Grant thanked the City’s entire team for going to Tallahassee to advocate  
for the City of Lauderhill.  
She congratulated the members of the Lauderhill  
Shines Cohort 10; the City looked forward to assisting them and their being  
successful in their endeavors. The first Mayor’s Listening Tour was held that  
consisted of going around the community, and engaging with HOA presidents,  
community leaders, businesses, and property owners to discuss moving  
Lauderhill forward.  
She noted they had discussions about the state of  
Lauderhill, existing issues and concerns the community had, and how they  
could be resolved. The first meeting was fantastic, at which a number of clergy  
members were present, and who discussed some of their concerns, and City  
representatives present discussed how the City could help.  
She said City  
representatives came away with very good feedback on how to move forward,  
and things that could be changed in the City’s system. The next meeting would  
be held on March 6, 2025, at which they would hold discussions with HOA  
presidents, board members, etc. to have more conversations around the  
betterment of Lauderhill; additional meetings would be held with local business  
owners, property owners, and nonprofit organizations that supported the City of  
Lauderhill. She urged the community to support this initiative, as information on  
the meetings could be found on the City’s social media platforms for everyone  
to be aware, as well as share the information with individuals and businesses  
they knew would be interested in participating.  
XVIII ADJOURNMENT - 8:09 PM