City of Lauderhill  
City Commission Chambers at City Hall  
5581 W. Oakland Park Blvd.  
Lauderhill, FL, 33313  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Monday, January 27, 2025  
6:00 PM  
City Commission Chambers  
City Commission Meeting  
LAUDERHILL CITY COMMISSION  
Mayor Denise D. Grant  
Vice Mayor Sarai "Ray" Martin  
Commissioner Richard Campbell  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn  
Commissioner John T. Hodgson  
Kennie Hobbs, Interim City Manager  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
Hans Ottinot, Interim City Attorney  
I CALL TO ORDER  
Mayor D. Grant called to order the Regular City Commission Meeting at 6:00  
PM.  
II ROLL CALL  
5 -  
Present:  
Commissioner Richard R. Campbell,Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn,Commissioner  
John T. Hodgson,Vice Mayor Sarai Martin, and Mayor Denise D. Grant  
III  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (AND CITY MANAGER RESPONSES TO  
THE PUBLIC, IF THE TIME PERMITS DURING THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING OF  
THE CITY COMMISSION)  
IV ADJOURNMENT (NO LATER THAN 6:30 PM)  
I CALL TO ORDER OF REGULAR MEETING  
II HOUSEKEEPING  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, to ACCEPT the Revised Version of the City Commission Meeting Agenda  
for January 27, 2025. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
III PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG FOLLOWED BY GOOD AND WELFARE  
IV CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Vice Mayor S.  
Martin, that this Consent Agenda was approved. The motion carried by the  
following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
V APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
VI PROCLAMATIONS / COMMENDATIONS (10 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
VII PRESENTATIONS (15 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
A. A PRESENTATION FOR MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY (REQUESTED BY MAYOR DENISE D. GRANT).  
XI QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
All persons wishing to speak on item eight were collectively sworn in.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-16: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
8.  
A
COMMISSION OF LAUDERHILL, FL GRANTING "4 AM LOUNGE BAR  
AND GRILL" A SPECIAL EXCEPTION USE DEVELOPMENT ORDER,  
WITH CONDITIONS, TO ALLOW AN EXISTING RESTAURANT BAR  
WITH  
ACCESSORY  
LIVE  
ENTERTAINMENT  
AN  
ADDITIONAL  
ACCESSORY USE "HOOKAH LOUNGE" IN A COMMERCIAL SPACE  
APPROXIMATELY 4,200 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL  
WAREHOUSE (CW) ZONING DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE ARTS AND  
ENTERTAINMENT (A&E) OVERLAY DISTRICT ON A 2.62 ACRE SITE  
LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF INDUSTRIAL 100 UNIT 1  
TRACTS A & B FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF  
BROWARD COUNTY, FL PLAT BOOK 85 PAGE 3, MORE COMMONLY  
KNOWN AS: 3974 NW 19 STREET, LAUDERHILL, FL; PROVIDING FOR  
CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Commissioner Dunn asked what time the applicant usually closed for business.  
Vernon Burroughs, the applicant, replied 2:00 a.m.  
Commissioner Dunn noticed in the backup there was a complaint from a  
resident, potentially, about noise, asking staff to elaborate on the complaint,  
what the rules were with regard to closing time, and the City’s noise ordinance.  
Senior Planner Molly Howson explained, per the City’s notification process,  
every property owner within 500 feet of the subject site was notified of the  
present meeting, and application for consideration by the City Commission.  
One property owner responded, and, based on the information they submitted,  
staff was unsure if they were a business or residential property owner; they  
stated they did not support the subject application based on the area already  
being surrounding by an excess of noise day and night, and they felt a hookah  
lounge would exacerbate the existing situation. She said, based on reading the  
complaint, she was unsure if the complainant was aware this was an existing  
bar/lounge seeking to extend their uses to include hookah.  
Commissioner Dunn asked staff to explain the conditions for approval in the  
backup.  
Ms. Howson indicated the conditions city staff recommended were mostly  
standard conditions for approval that were reiterated with applicants that had  
more noise-oriented businesses.  
The conditions applied to the applicant  
agreeing, if approved, to: operate Sunday 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; close on  
Monday; open Tuesday through Saturday 2:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. She stated if  
the applicant failed to comply with any of these conditions, the subject special  
exception could be brought back to the Commission. There were mechanical  
permitting requirements that had to be installed for the hookah lounge use, as  
with any type of indoor smoking use to ensure a proper filtration system.  
Commissioner Dunn noted a preexisting violation in relation to the hours of  
operation, asking if this was resolved.  
Ms. Howson responded that the City received no further complaints about the  
hours of operation being exceeded since the complaint.  
Commissioner Dunn asked the applicant about complying with the Citys  
condition for approval requiring the installation of upgraded mechanical  
installations to improve air filtration, along with the condition to close at 2:00  
a.m. rather than 4:00 a.m.  
Mr. Burroughs replied that he had no problem with changing the closing time,  
though the reason for the name of his business was they opened until 4:00  
a.m., but this was a discussion for another day, as he was willing to comply  
with the closing time condition for approval.  
Commissioner Hodgson expressed health concerns, and whether there was  
sufficient space for the added use, asking if hookah users would occupy the  
space currently used by patrons.  
Mr. Burroughs affirmed it was definitely a restaurant and lounge, but they had  
different hours for various services; for example, they served breakfast, they did  
happy hour, and served lunch, all at different hours. At around 10:00 p.m. or  
11:00 p.m., that was when the space was turned into a lounge, at which time  
patrons could use the hookah, and the food served would be bar type foods,  
such as wings, fries, etc.  
Commissioner Hodgson remarked on the health hazards of smoking, and  
patrons who sought only to drink and eat could be adversely affected by having  
to interact with patrons choosing to smoke.  
Ms. Howson added City staff found that the proposed additional use in the  
subject application was in line with the minimum State requirements with regard  
to the Florida Clean Air Act that provided that smoking could not happen in  
restaurants, but it was allowed in standalone bars.  
Commissioner Campbell hoped to tour Mr. Burroughs’s business soon, stating  
this was the City’s designated entertainment district; in future years a variety of  
entertainment businesses would be brought to the Commission for approval.  
He tended not to judge what others chose to do, and though he was not a  
smoker, if the City sought to encourage businesses to come to the subject  
area, then it was important not to erect too many obstacles to them conducting  
business, particularly if their operations were within the confines of the law.  
This would serve as a positive message to other businesses wishing to come  
to Lauderhill. He supported businesses, and their efforts to thrive, and provide a  
variety of services for patrons to choose from.  
Mayor Grant asked how many hookah lounges there were in Lauderhill at  
present, and how far apart were they, asking if the City had a distance  
requirement for the use.  
Ms. Howson responded the applicant’s hookah lounge would make three in  
Lauderhill; one legal hookah lounge was on University Drive, Rotana Hookah  
Café established prior to there being any state, county, or city laws regulating  
the use; they had no alcoholic beverage sales associated with them.  
The  
second hookah lounge in the City was Liquid Paradise; they were situated in the  
same plaza as 4AM Lounge, and they had yet to complete their permitting  
process for the mechanical upgrades; as soon as that was completed, they  
could officially add hookah to their certificate of use. Staff suggested the City  
institute a distance requirement outside of the arts and entertainment overlay  
district; the use was being treated similar to that of alcoholic beverage  
establishments, allowing no distance separation for such uses within the arts  
and entertainment corridor.  
Mayor Grant wished to know how the City could begin the process of  
establishing distance separation for hookah uses outside the entertainment  
district.  
Ms. Howson replied the Commission need only direct Planning  
Director Daniel Keester-O’Mills and her to begin the process.  
& Zoning  
Mayor Grant questioned the safeguards in place to ensure the addition of a  
hookah lounge did not impact the health and safety of the surrounding  
community, and how such impacts would be monitored by the City.  
She  
assumed staff’s due diligence led them to already considered health and safety  
aspects, so such uses created no real health crisis, or presented the creation  
of a hazardous health environment.  
Ms. Howson replied the City would do a few things: only persons 21 and over  
were allowed in the applicant’s business; having a use granted by special  
exception on the City’s books increased staff’s ability to act on anticipated  
adverse conditions, as it allowed staff to bring the use back to the Commission,  
should any issues arise; and staff stayed in tune to state statutes as they  
developed, to ensure the City remained on the cutting edge, as the subject use  
was comparable to cigarette/cigar smoking.  
Mayor Grant recalled a previous issue related to vaping, and hookah appeared  
to be trendy, so she assumed this was the reason the applicant sought to add  
this use.  
Ms. Howson mentioned staff heard from local businesses that hookah was a  
use they wished to have the option of adding, so they could provide similar  
offerings as those of their competitors.  
Mayor Grant assumed the smoking would take place inside the applicants  
business, but she recalled seeing patrons of another hookah establishment on  
University Drive smoking outside the business.  
Ms. Howson affirmed the business on University Drive did have chairs outside;  
she would look into whether they were allowed to smoke outside the business;  
the 4AM Lounge had no outdoor seating.  
Commissioner Dunn recalled when the Commission approved an earlier text  
amendment, the Commission understood it would be a pilot in the subject zone,  
after which the Commission and staff would reevaluate as it pertained to some  
of the Mayor’s points. She asked if, at that time, there was any agreement on a  
time period for the pilot to run before evaluation, and discussion with the  
Commission, particularly as to whether the use would be permitted elsewhere  
in Lauderhill.  
Ms. Howson responded, short of reviewing the previous meetings minutes, she  
could not recall if there was a time-certain, but the she knew the aim was to see  
how the use played out in the subject district. She doubted sufficient time had  
passed, but staff could research how such uses were handled in other Broward  
cities.  
Commissioner Dunn wondered what, in Ms. Howson’s opinion, was  
a
reasonable timeframe for the pilot to run to allow staff to evaluate, and make a  
determination on whether the subject use was fulfilling the intent of its approval;  
that is, to allow local businesses to add another revenue stream to their  
business without creating additional public health hazards.  
Ms. Howson thought a year was appropriate to make such an assessment;  
other parts of the discussion could include what were appropriate uses to which  
the subject use should be allowed as an accessory use.  
Commissioner Dunn added part of the determination was whether to restrict the  
use to the arts and entertainment district, or allow it elsewhere in the City.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
VIII  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - FIRST READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
1.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-01-102: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING  
CHAPTER 2 ENTITLED “ADMINISTRATION,” ARTICLE II ENTITLED  
“OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES,” BY DELETING SECTION 2-21  
ENTITLED “COMMISSION TO APPROVE JOB DESCRIPTIONS PRIOR  
TO FILLING POSITIONS AND CHANGES IN JOB DESCRIPTIONS”;  
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND CODIFICATION;  
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY  
INTERIM CITY MANAGER KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Interim City Manager Hobbs explained city staff was currently reviewing all city  
policies, and he identified the subject policy as one that could improve  
operational efficiencies.  
Currently, the City Commission approved the overall  
budget, including the funding of positions. In 1982 when the City had a strong  
mayor, the Commission was required to approve all modifications to job  
descriptions, but in staff’s survey of other Broward cities, with the exception of  
Plantation that had a strong mayor form of government, this was not a normal  
practice.  
This led to his present request to remove the necessity to come  
before the Commission to make changes to job descriptions in line with the city  
manager being the chief operating officer within the City. There was no request  
to make any changes with regard to the budget authority of the Commission, so  
the Commission would continue to approve positions funded within the budget;  
the change would help enhance city operations related to job descriptions.  
Mayor Grant wished to know what measures were in place, or would be put in  
place to ensure that the delegation of the authority of for job descriptions to the  
city manager would not compromise transparency, and accountability within the  
hiring process.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs responded nothing would change in the hiring  
process, as regardless of a job description, all applicants still had to go through  
the City’s formal hiring process. The only change to that process would be a  
reduction in the amount time to advertise and hire for a position.  
Mayor Grant said if the subject item were approved, she wished staff to provide  
the Commission with an organizational chart, including any assistant director  
positions; and, going forward, that the Commission would be alerted to any  
hiring or salary increases that impacted the City’s budget by five percent or  
more.  
She said the same applied to advising the Commission of any  
consideration to create a new department/division, as this meant a new budget  
item.  
Commissioner Dunn commented, while she understood the need for efficiency,  
she intended to vote no on the subject item, as she wished to see a permanent  
city manager appointed first before making such a change.  
Commissioner Campbell sought clarification that Mayor Grants requests had  
no impact on the subject item the Commission was being asked to vote on.  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot affirmed this was the case.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner  
Campbell, that this Ordinance be approved on first reading to the City  
Commission Meeting, due back on 2/10/2025. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
4 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner J. Hodgson, Vice Mayor S. Martin, and  
Mayor D. Grant  
1 - Commissioner M. Dunn  
No:  
0
Abstain:  
2.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-01-103: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, APPROVING  
AN INTERDEPARTMENTAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT  
OF $933,852 AND  
A
CAPITAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE  
AMOUNT OF $1,746,014 AND A SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION IN  
THE AMOUNT OF $128,339 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025; REFLECTING  
APROPRIATE  
ADJUSTMENTS  
TO  
VARIOUS  
REVENUE  
AND  
EXPENDITURE ACCOUNTS AS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED IN THE  
BREAKDOWN IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $2,808,205; PROVIDING  
VARIOUS BUDGET CODE NUMBERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER,  
KENNIE HOBBS, JR).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda on first reading to the City  
Commission Meeting, due back on 02/10/2025. (See Consideration of Consent  
Agenda for vote tally.)  
IX  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - SECOND READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
3.  
ORDINANCE NO. 25O-01-100: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, AMENDING  
CHAPTER 21 ENTITLED “WATER AND SEWER SERVICE,” ARTICLE IV  
ENTITLED “DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING  
SERVICES RULES, REGULATIONS AND RATES,” SECTION 21-47  
ENTITLED “SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES” OF THE CODE  
OF ORDINANCES TO DELETE REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEES AND  
TO  
ESTABLISH  
WATER  
HOUSING  
CONNECTION  
DEVELOPMENTS;  
CHARGES  
FOR  
NEW  
FOR  
MULTI-FAMILY  
PROVIDING  
CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING  
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER  
KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
X RESOLUTIONS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
4.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-06:  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING  
COMPLIMENTARY TICKETS POLICY EXCLUSIVELY FOR MEMBERS  
OF THE CITY COMMISSION FOR EVENTS HELD AT CITY-OWNED  
VENUES OR EVENTS SPONSORED BY THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL;  
PROVIDING THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE WITH THE  
AUTHORITY TO DO ALL THINGS TO EFFECTUATE THIS RESOLUTION;  
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY  
INTERIM CITY MANAGER, KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Commissioner Dunn wished to put on the record a small change to the  
language she previously discussed with Mr. Ottinot, noting she thought all the  
changes discussed at the last Commission meeting were handled well.  
Specifically, under Scope, section 1.2 that currently read in the last sentence:  
The members of the City Commission of Lauderhill, when attending  
city-sponsored events, or events held in city-owned venues or while conducting  
business on behalf of the City … She recommended the words …or while… be  
replaced with …when..  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner J.  
Hodgson, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
5.  
RESOLUTION 25R-01-13: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION  
OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING A QUOTE FROM UTILITIES  
ASSOCIATES, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $915,000 FOR THE  
PURCHASE OF BODY WORN CAMERA, STORAGE EQUIPMENT,  
SOFTWARE AND SERVICES FOR POLICE, FIRE AND CODE  
ENFORCEMENT IN-CAR COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS UNDER THE  
EXISTING  
AGREEMENT;  
AUTHORIZING  
PAYMENT  
FROM  
THE  
APPROPRIATE BUDGET CODE NUMBERS OVER  
A
THREE YEAR  
PERIOD; AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND OTHER  
OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER KENNIE  
HOBBS).  
Mayor Grant asked staff to give a presentation on the subject item for the benefit  
of the Lauderhill public.  
Police Chief Constance Stanley spoke about the body-worn cameras, with  
which all police officers were equipped when responding to calls for service; it  
was a three-year agreement, and there were city policies that stipulated all  
officers should activate their body-worn cameras while on calls for service.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs added the City had a replacement plan with a  
three-year cycle, so the City was renewing its existing contract for another three  
years, whereby about 140 body-worn cameras would be replaced.  
Commissioner  
Campbell  
noticed  
the  
resolution’s  
language  
said  
code  
enforcement, asking if this meant code officers were wearing body-worn  
cameras.  
Chief Stanley answered no.  
Mr. Hobbs explained that within the agreement, it allowed for the utilization of  
communication devices by police officers, city rangers, and code officers.  
He  
said this portion of the agreement affected those devices; only police officers  
wore body-worn cameras.  
Mayor Grant opened the discussion to the public.  
Hubert Shaw, Lauderhill resident, sought clarification as to whether the  
body-worn cameras had to be updated every three years.  
Major David Hennessy commented the City’s contract with Utility Associates  
was that they refresh the hardware very frequently. In the specific case of the  
body-worn cameras, the contract was for the next three years, and they would  
immediately provide the City with 280 cameras, as each police officer would be  
issued two cameras to ensure there were no battery issues, particularly if an  
officer worked overtime or a 12-hour shift.  
He explained, along with being  
body-worn, the cameras were utilized to take pictures on crime scenes, as well  
as take statements during criminal investigations, so the battery life of the  
cameras was very important.  
He pointed out the majority of the in-car  
communication for all the City’s police cars, along with frontline fire rescue, and  
code enforcement were being refreshed as well. Thus, any camera equipment  
installed in the vehicles in the last year or two would be replaced; the  
equipment, essentially, made the vehicles  
a
Wi-Fi hotspot for authorized  
hardware. Major Hennessy mentioned, about 18 months into the current  
agreement, the vendor would provide the City with the next generation body  
cameras, so police officers would receive two new body-worn cameras in the  
next three-year agreement.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Commissioner J.  
Hodgson, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
6.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-14:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL CREATING THE NEW  
JOB DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM  
CITY MANAGER, KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Attachments:  
Commissioner Dunn asked staff to explain the reasoning behind creating the  
subject new position.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs explained city administration sought to create a  
new  
department,  
Development  
Services;  
the  
new  
department  
would  
encompass a number of existing divisions, and departments, the goal being to  
increase efficiencies and improve customer service to both residents and  
businesses.  
Department, currently  
Under Development Services would be the Planning & Zoning  
standalone department, and the Building Division,  
a
currently under the Finance Department. Code enforcement would be split in  
two, with one portion moving to Development Services that focused on  
enforcing the City’s building and planning codes; the other portion related to  
revenue generation would remain under Financial Services; the latter included  
the issuance of certificates of use, inspections, etc.  
Development Services  
would have a single director to which the three divisions would report; the intent  
was to fill the position internally with minimal budgetary impact that would be  
due to some standard salary adjustment.  
Commissioner Dunn noted in her meeting with Mr. Hobbs she asked him to  
provide a work chart for Development Services to make it clear for the record  
what this entailed.  
Mayor Grant opened the discussion to the public.  
Catherine Collette, Lauderhill resident, asked if appointing a new director for the  
new department meant any directors were losing their position.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs answered no.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Commissioner J.  
Hodgson, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
7.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-15:  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH EUGENE M.  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
STEINFELD, ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.A., TO SERVE AS A SPECIAL  
MASTER FOR THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION OF  
TAMAR N. HAMILTON, P.A. TO SERVE AS  
A
SPECIAL MASTER  
UNDER THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS; AUTHORIZING THE  
INTERIM CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE EACH AGREEMENT; AND  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY INTERIM  
CITY MANAGER, KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot noted for the record that Ms. Hamilton submitted  
her bid for an executed contract to the City Manager via the City Attorney earlier  
today.  
Commissioner Dunn desired an explanation of the role of a special master.  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot stated, under the city code, the special master  
acted as  
a
judge, presiding over hearings of citations issued by code  
enforcement staff for violations; the special master made determinations of guilt  
or innocence of property owners. Mr. Hobbs indicated the City needed to have  
two special masters in the event one was unavailable for a hearing.  
Commissioner Dunn wished to know the estimated value of the contract.  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot responded, based on the contract terms, each  
special master would receive $400.00 per hearing.  
Commissioner Dunn asked if the City always used special masters, or if this  
was something new.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs replied that the use of a special master was not  
something the City always did, but it was something the City began using in  
more recent years; in past years, the business portion of the certificate of use  
(COU), minimum housing inspections, etc. were actually heard before the Code  
Enforcement Board.  
Due to the issues and concerns city administration had  
once the City began actively enforcing the COU process, and closing  
businesses down, one of the matters that arose was that before the City could  
actually close down a business, owners had to first go before a special master,  
so their case could be heard; thus, rather than the decision being made at Code  
Enforcement Department level, it was determined that such decisions would be  
made at the special master level. Mr. Hobbs indicated there was a need for the  
special master to be at both of the twice monthly Code Enforcement Board  
meetings when citations were heard. Because city staff was working through  
the City’s code enforcement process, doing inspections, and enforcing city  
code, the process went from one to two meetings per month; the second  
meeting was important, as, in the past, there were instances when the special  
master was not available for the second meeting, so they had to be cancelled.  
He said hiring a second special master would reduce the need to cancel the  
second meeting, as in some instances, businesses were closed temporarily  
while awaiting their case to be heard, so they could reopen.  
Commissioner Dunn questioned how the City arrived at hiring the specific two  
individuals as special masters.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs responded that the current special master was  
hired via an agreement with Eugene Steinfeld about a year ago.  
Commissioner Dunn knew Mr. Steinfeld had an excellent reputation; he worked  
with the City of Margate for over 20 years.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs said the City worked through a process with him  
some time prior, and actually had a contract to move forward, but the item failed  
to move forward, so staff sought to do so now, as his services were already  
engaged. The proposed agreement was to hire Ms. Hamilton as the second  
special master.  
Commissioner Dunn asked if the City went out to bid for the second special  
master, or was her hiring just based on Mr. Ottinot’s recommendation.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs stated the decision was not based only on Mr.  
Ottinot’s recommendation, but on staff’s review of qualified individuals; the City  
did not go out to bid to contract a second special master, as the city code did  
not require it, as it fell under the threshold requiring the contract go out to bid.  
Commissioner Dunn remarked, for the record, she did her due diligence for Mr.  
Steinfeld, and she heard great things; she was familiar with Ms. Hamilton, as  
she graduated from the Lauderhill Shines program. She was always in favor of  
doing business with Lauderhill business, which Ms. Hamilton’s was.  
Mayor Grant wished to know what processes were in place to ensure that the  
rulings of the special masters were aligned with the Citys legal, and policy  
priorities, and how would the impact of their rulings be evaluated over time.  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot replied that a city attorney sat as the attorney for the  
special master at the Code Enforcement Board meetings; this provided an  
opportunity for the city attorney to evaluate the special masters performance.  
Usually any complaints would come from either city staff or residents if they felt  
they were not being treated appropriately by a special master, or if they felt the  
city code was not being enforced as required. He said should such a situation  
arise, the City Manager and he would review the evidence and make a  
determination.  
Mayor Grant asked if complaints about the special master would come before  
the Commission, or whether that was a purely administrative process.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs commented that the determination of the contract  
would be done at the city management level, but if this resulted in the need to  
hire  
a
replacement special master, that matter would come before the  
Commission.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner  
Campbell, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
7A.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-17:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE FIFTH  
AMENDED ANNUAL CALENDAR OF CITY HOSTED SPECIAL EVENTS  
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY INTERIM CITY MANAGER, KENNIE HOBBS, JR.).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
7B.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-18:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
APPOINTMENT OF VARIOUS MEMBERS OT THE PLANNING AND  
ZONING BOARD BY VARIOUS INDIVIDUAL CITY COMMISSIONERS AS  
INDICATED  
FOR  
THE  
TERMS  
INDICATED;  
APPOINTING  
_____________ BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS A WHOLE TO SERVE  
FOR THE REMAINDER OF A TWO (2) YEAR TERM THAT SHALL  
EXPIRE NOVEMBER 2026; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Mayor Grant said she previously appointed Aryeh Shender while sitting as a city  
commissioner; she wished him to remain as her appointee by the Mayor.  
City Clerk Anderson noted Commissioner Campbell already appointed Troy  
Mohammed to serve until 2028; the City Commission, as a whole, needed to  
make an appointment, a seat currently filled by Bob Schankweiler, who said he  
was interest in continuing to serve. Other positions on the board could be filled  
by individual commissioners.  
Commissioner Campbell sought clarification as to the number of members on  
the Planning & Zoning Board.  
City Clerk Anderson stated each member of the Commission made an  
appointment, and then two appointments were made by the Commission as a  
whole, so seven in all.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor S. Martin, seconded by Commissioner  
Campbell, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
7C.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-19:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
APPOINTMENT OF ____________ BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS A  
WHOLE TO SERVE AS A MEMBER OF THE GENERAL EMPLOYEE  
PENSION BOARD FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM EXPIRING  
JUNE 2026; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Vice Mayor S.  
Martin, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
7D.  
RESOLUTION NO. 25R-01-20:  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL APPOINTING  
___________ BY THE CITY COMMISSION AS A WHOLE TO SERVE AS  
A MEMBER OF THE FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD  
OF TRUSTEES FOR THE REMAINDER OF A TWO (2) YEAR TERM  
EXPIRING NOVEMBER 2026; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.  
Interim City Manager Hobbs stated Ryan Gabner currently served on the subject  
board; he worked with the City’s Fire Department; the request was for the him  
to remain on the board.  
Commissioner Dunn asked if Mr. Gabner was  
standing.  
a board member in good  
Interim Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Sean Henderson affirmed Mr.  
Gabner was board member in good standing; he frequently attended  
a
meetings, and had great insight as it related to the union, etc.  
A motion was made by Commissioner M. Dunn, seconded by Vice Mayor S.  
Martin, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner R. Campbell, Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner J. Hodgson,  
Vice Mayor S. Martin, and Mayor D. Grant  
0
Abstain:  
XII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, FIRST READING  
XIII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, SECOND READING  
XIV UNFINISHED BUSINESS  
XV OLD BUSINESS  
XVI NEW BUSINESS  
XVII  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY  
BEFORE ADJOURNMENT  
Interim City Manager Hobbs announced there would be an MLK concert event  
scheduled for February 8, 2025, at the Lauderhill Performing Arts Center  
(LPAC); tickets were currently on sale, and Jeffery Osborne was the headliner.  
Commissioner Campbell remarked in 2026 the FIFA World Cup would take  
place; it was considered the world’s largest sporting event, and it was held  
every four years. He said the U.S., Mexico, and Canada would share this event,  
and South Florida venues would host seven of the games, of which the Miami  
Stadium, which was the Hard Rock Stadium, would be renamed due to  
promotional rights for the event.  
He mentioned being recently asked about  
promoting the event in Broward County, as FIFA estimated the event would  
generate about $1.3 billion in South Florida, so the City needed to position itself  
to benefit from the activities. The last time the event came to the U.S was in  
1994. He would give updates at future commission meetings.  
Vice Mayor Martin commended the City’s Police Department (PD) for the call to  
action; the past Sunday his car was broken into in his driveway at about 2:00  
a.m., and he noticed that cars parked at the Cricket Club were broken into the  
same evening. Two of the four suspects were apprehended due to the quick  
response of the Lauderhill PD to an anonymous call of prowlers in the area, with  
the police cordoning off the area to create a box, and two individuals were found  
hiding; car keys were found in the pocket of one of the suspects.  
Officer  
Cuervo, in driving around the area, passed Vice Mayor Martins house and  
noticed the light on in his vehicle, so she retrieved the keys, went back to his  
house, and she found that the key fob opened the vehicle. She knocked on his  
door, questioned him and discovered he did not know the keys were stolen; it  
was likely that the plan was to come back at a later time to steal the car. Her  
actions went above and beyond, and when she asked him if he wished to press  
charges, his immediate thought was to protect the community, and say no, the  
likely response of many in the community. However, he told her yes, and he  
encouraged others in the community to press charges, as it was very  
disheartening for police officers to be so vigilant, as in the subject situation the  
Broward Sheriff’s Office (BSO) helicopter, and a K-9 Unit were brought in; after  
taking all these steps to keep the community safe, and find the suspect(s), it  
would have been disappointing to have a victim refuse to press charges. The  
latter only hurt the community, allowing such individuals to go back out, and  
commit more crimes, sometimes even more heinous, while residents  
complained there was too much crime in Lauderhill.  
He said for the Citys  
crime stats to decrease, every member of the community needed to trust that  
the police would arrest guilty individuals, as today the community was more  
educated, and police officers were much more professional. His call to action  
to the community was: keep key fobs inside one’s house; lock your doors;  
continue to lookout; and press charges when officers apprehended individuals  
committing crimes.  
Interim City Attorney Ottinot noted for the record that President Trump issued  
broad executive orders regarding immigration, enforcement, diversity inclusion  
programs, and proposed pauses on federal funding that would impact the City  
of Lauderhill’s local governance. Mayor Grant directed Mr. Hobbs and he to  
discuss these relevant executive orders at a future workshop.  
Commissioner  
Dunn, too, asked Mr. Hobbs and he to discuss the executive order on  
immigration at a future workshop.  
Commissioner Hodgson thanked Vice Mayor Martin for his comments, noting he  
supported his advice to the Lauderhill public, as it was necessary to work with  
the City’s police officers, supporting them in every way possible.  
important to be more neighborly during such times, working to prevent crimes.  
It was  
Commissioner Dunn announced that on January 28, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. there  
would be a public meeting in the City Commission Chambers at City Hall to  
discuss the City’s Transportation Master Plan, as well as the Parks Master  
Plan. The public was invited to attend, and share their thoughts as the City  
decided on the future of Lauderhill’s transportation and parks. She noted on  
Thursday, January 30, 2025, at 8:00 a.m., the City would hold its first Lauderhill  
Success Summit; discussions would include opportunities for nonprofits to gain  
resources to continue their work, as well as access to capital for small  
businesses, unveiling and rolling out the prosperity project, where small  
business could access up to a $15,000.00 zero interest loans. They would also  
roll out the Keys to Lauderhill initiative that included a first-time homebuyer grant  
from Chase.  
Interested persons could go to lauderhill-fl.gov/successsummit to  
register. Commissioner Dunn stated the Lauderhill Shines applications were  
still open; they would close on January 30, 2025, with interviews commencing in  
the next week; the program would begin cohort ten in February. She said the  
program would offer 14 weeks of support to help persons scale their business,  
or start a business in the City of Lauderhill. The Safe Street Summit would take  
place in Palm Beach County on February 6 and 7, 2025; she would share the  
event information with Lauderhill residents, and her fellow commissioners  
interested in transportation. She would be representing the City of Lauderhill as  
the City’s Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) representative.  
Commissioner Dunn mentioned the legislative session began, and Governor  
DeSantis called  
immigration, and insurance.  
a
special session, where discussions would center on  
She urged residents to pay attention to the  
Legislature’s discussions in Tallahassee, and the City would work to make sure  
the Lauderhill community stayed informed on what was happening. It was also  
important to support and pray for the City’s state representatives; she saw  
numerous bills coming out on education, and many could impact Broward  
County schools.  
She received numerous calls from residents expressing  
concerns about the impact of immigration activities; there was a hotline they  
could call or text to report any challenges being faced: 1-888-600-5762. The  
hotline was for anyone needing help with deportation defense, legal  
connections, TPS and citizenship service, labor issues, and wage theft, or  
support for immigrant survivors of violence. She would share this information,  
which was also available in Creole, English, and Spanish with the City Manager,  
so it could be posted on the various City media. The service was provided by  
the Florida Immigrant Coalition.  
Mayor Grant mentioned the Mayor’s Listening Tour would begin on February 13,  
2025, and it was about listening to the community; she would begin with  
Lauderhill’s clergy members, including pastors, rabbis, and imams to hear their  
concerns.  
concerns, etc.; they would also go to the City’s HOAs to ensure the whole  
Lauderhill community was being served effectively. She noted the Lauderhill  
Oftentimes, because they had congregations who voiced many  
Public Safety Forum would take place in March 2025; the exact date would be  
posted on the City’s website; they would discuss the public safety of the  
community, taking a comprehensive approach.  
A variety of guests would be  
invited to sit at the table to discuss best practices, as it was essential to hear  
from other law enforcement professionals from other cities with similar  
demographics, and experiences to those of Lauderhill, and the steps they took  
to effectively address various issues. She commented on February 10, 2025,  
the City would be celebrating Black History Month and Reggae Month; all  
cultures in Lauderhill would be celebrated, and some strong individuals who  
impacted the Lauderhill community would be honored, including some from the  
national stage.  
She, too, held conversations with Mr. Hobbs and Zach  
Davis-Walker to follow all of the executive orders being proposed at the federal  
and state levels, so the Commission could get a full understanding of what  
needed to be done, and could be done do, so City staff and the Commission  
could better educate the Lauderhill community.  
She received numerous calls  
from pastors concerned about the immigration component, what their  
congregants’ and their rights were. Mayor Grant said she would try to lead a  
charge with the clergy members to help them access resources, and provide  
them information they could take back to their parishioners.  
XVIII ADJOURNMENT - 7:48 PM