City of Lauderhill  
City Commission Chambers at City Hall  
5581 W. Oakland Park Blvd.  
Lauderhill, FL, 33313  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Monday, February 12, 2024  
6:00 PM  
City Commission Chambers  
City Commission Meeting  
LAUDERHILL CITY COMMISSION  
Mayor Ken Thurston  
Vice Mayor Lawrence Martin  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn  
Commissioner Denise D. Grant  
Commissioner Sarai Martin  
Desorae Giles-Smith, City Manager  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
Angel Petti Rosenberg, City Attorney  
I CALL TO ORDER  
Mayor Thurston called to order the Regular City Commission Meeting at 6:02  
PM.  
II ROLL CALL  
5 -  
Present:  
Commissioner Melissa P. Dunn,Commissioner Denise D. Grant,Vice Mayor  
Lawrence Martin,Commissioner Sarai Martin, and Mayor Ken Thurston  
ALSO PRESENT:  
Desorae Giles-Smith, City Manager  
Angel Petti Rosenberg, City Attorney  
Constance Stanley, Police Chief  
Andrea M. Anderson, City Clerk  
III COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC (AND RESPONSES TO THE PUBLIC, IF  
THE TIME PERMITS DURING THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION)  
IV ADJOURNMENT (NO LATER THAN 6:30 PM)  
I CALL TO ORDER OF REGULAR MEETING  
II PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG FOLLOWED BY GOOD AND WELFARE  
HOUSEKEEPING  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, to ACCEPT the Revised Version of the City Commission Meeting Agenda  
for February 12, 2024. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
III CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT AGENDA  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Consent Agenda was approved. The motion carried by the  
following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
IV APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
V PROCLAMATIONS / COMMENDATIONS  
A.  
A
PROCLAMATION DECLARING FEBRUARY 2024 AS NATIONAL  
TEEN DATING VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH (REQUESTED BY  
COMMISSIONER MELISSA P. DUNN).  
VI SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS (10 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
A.  
A
PRESENTATION  
RECOGNIZING  
2024 MLK  
SCHOLARSHIP  
RECIPIENTS  
(REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER  
DESORAE  
GILES-SMITH).  
B.  
A
PRESENTATION  
FROM  
COUNTY  
COMMISSIONER  
HAZELLE  
ROGERS ON THE "MAYOR AND COMMISSIONERS FOR  
A
DAY"  
PROGRAM  
(REQUESTED  
BY  
CITY  
MANAGER  
DESORAE  
GILES-SMITH).  
ITEM REMOVED  
C.  
D.  
A
PRESENTATION  
FOR  
AMERICAN  
HEART  
HEALTH  
MONTH  
(REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER DENISE D. GRANT).  
Attachments:  
VII GENERAL PRESENTATIONS (5 MINUTES MAXIMUM)  
ITEM REMOVED  
A.  
B.  
A PRESENTATION OF THE FEBRUARY 2024 HOME OF THE MONTH  
(REQUESTED BY COMMISSIONER SARAI "RAY" MARTIN).  
Attachments:  
VIII  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - FIRST READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
1.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-02-105: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2,  
ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE IV, CITY COMMISSION, SECTION 2-159,  
ORDER OF BUSINESS; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING  
FOR  
SEVERABILITY;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
AN  
EFFECTIVE  
DATE  
(REQUESTED BY VICE MAYOR, LAWRENCE “JABBOW” MARTIN).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda on first reading to the City  
Commission Meeting, due back on 02/26/2024. (See Consideration of Consent  
Agenda for vote tally.)  
2.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-02-106: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 2,  
ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE IV, CITY COMMISSION, SECTION 2-166,  
CODE OF ETHICS/CODE OF CONDUCT FOR CITY PUBLIC OFFICERS  
AND  
CHARTER  
OFFICERS;  
PROVIDING  
FOR  
CODIFICATION;  
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE  
DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
Vice Mayor L. Martin asked staff to review the highlights of the proposed  
ordinance, and what it sought to accomplish.  
City Attorney Rosenberg reviewed the proposed ordinance, as detailed in the  
backup, highlighting the following:  
• In the City’s need to respond to some recent events, it was revealed that the  
City had no code of ethics/conduct for elected officials and other chartered  
officers  
• The subject ordinance sought to amend the City’s code provision to provide for  
a code of conduct/ethics that would apply to all public officers  
The statutory definition of a public officer included elected/appointed city  
officials, persons elected/appointed to serve on municipal boards, and  
chartered officers designated in the City’s Charter, including the city attorney,  
city manager, and city clerk  
• The proposed provisions provided guidelines on how affected persons should  
work, carry themselves, interact with city staff, and other public officers; the  
amended language included enforcement and penalty provisions, as none were  
in place  
• Enforcement penalties varied as the process progressed, depending on who  
and what was involved, such as: doing an independent investigation of the  
individual, whether it was an elected official, board appointee, or chartered  
officer; the penalties available were detailed in increasing severity: an oral  
reprimand delivered in a private meeting; a written reprimand delivered in a  
private meeting; public censure via resolution voted on at a public meeting;  
public reprimand issued in a newspaper if the stated language in section 3.07  
applied, but it would require a unanimous vote for that public reprimand; refer  
the matter to the Florida Governor for action, or refer to the Florida Commission  
on Ethics, Office of the Inspector General, or any other agency deemed  
appropriate, depending on the nature of the violation; lastly, any other lawful  
penalty deemed reasonable and appropriate; the enforcement of  
depended on if a violation was found.  
a penalty  
Vice Mayor L. Martin wished to impress upon the public that such matters were  
not taken lightly by the City, and he understood that before resorting to such  
actions, everything was done internally to address any situation that arose.  
Thus, it would not be a kneejerk reaction; in dealing with matters concerning  
City staff, and among the elected officials, there was the utmost need for the  
highest respect; people could agree to disagree, but must stay respectful to  
each other.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Ordinance be approved on first reading to the City Commission  
Meeting, due back on 2/26/2024. The motion carried by the following vote:  
4 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Vice Mayor L. Martin, Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor  
K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
Off Dais:  
1 - Commissioner D. Grant  
3.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-02-107: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 8, ELECTIONS,  
SECTION 8-10, CODE OF ETHICS FOR CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC  
OFFICE; PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS; PROVIDING FOR  
CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE  
GILES-SMITH).  
City Attorney Angel Rosenberg reviewed the subject ordinance, as detailed in  
the backup, highlighting the following:  
• When staff was drafting the City’s Code of Ethics ordinance for public officers,  
and chartered officers, there was already on the books a code of ethics for  
candidates running for public office in the City, but it had no enforcement  
penalties if a violation occurred  
• The only language proposed for addition to the existing code was to provide  
penalties if a candidate violated any of the existing provisions; that is, it could  
result in a fine of up to $500.00 per violation per day, and/or a referral to the  
Florida Elections Commission if deemed appropriate for further investigation  
and action, as this was the entity that governed election candidates.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner D.  
Grant, that this Ordinance be approved on first reading to the City Commission  
Meeting, due back on 2/26/2024. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
4.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-02-108: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
COMMERCIAL CONTRACT AMONGST THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL,  
THE LAUDERHILL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND  
TOBOLSKI, LLC. FOR THE PROPOSED PURCHASE OF THE  
COMMERCIAL  
REAL  
ESTATE  
LOCATED  
AT  
1451 N.W.  
31ST  
AVENUE, LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA INCLUDING THE EQUIPMENT AND  
FIXTURES IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,150,000.00 PLUS THE SELLER’S  
CLOSING COSTS CONTINGENT UPON THE RESULTS OF THE DUE  
DILIGENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY; AUTHORIZING THE CITY  
MANAGER, CRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AND CITY ATTORNEY TO  
NEGOTIATE  
ANY  
MODIFICATIONS  
DEEMED  
NECESSARY  
DEPENDING UPON THE RESULTS OF THE DUE DILIGENCE AND  
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FINDINGS; PROVIDING THAT THE CITY  
MANAGER AND CRA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ARE AUTHORIZED TO  
EXECUTE ANY DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO GIVE EFFECT TO THIS  
ORDINANCE;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED  
BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
City Attorney Rosenberg clarified this was the same item voted on in the CRA  
meeting held just prior to the present meeting, at which the CRA director gave a  
PowerPoint presentation.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Ordinance be approved on first reading to the City Commission  
Meeting, due back on 2/26/2024. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
IX  
ORDINANCES & PUBLIC HEARINGS - SECOND READING (NOT ON CONSENT  
AGENDA) (AS ADVERTISED IN THE SUN-SENTINEL)  
5.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-01-101: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY  
OF LAUDERHILL CODE OF ORDINANCES, APPENDIX G,  
FRANCHISES, ARTICLE III, GARBAGE, REFUSE AND TRASH, EXHIBIT  
“A” AMENDING THE RATE SCHEDULE OF FEES THAT WENT INTO  
EFFECT BY THE SERVICE PROVIDER ON OCTOBER 1, 2023;  
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
6.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-01-102: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL AMENDING THE CODE  
OF  
ORDINANCES,  
CHAPTER  
UNSIGHTLY  
10,  
GARBAGE  
AND  
TRASH/UNSANITARY  
AND  
CONDITIONS/ABANDONED  
REAL PROPERTY; ARTICLE II, RECYCLABLE WASTE, SECTION 10-22,  
FEES TO UPDATE THE FEE SCHEDULE WITH RATES EFFECTIVE  
AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2023; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
7.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-01-103: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
TRANSFER OF LAND AND PERSONAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT  
1249-1281 N.W. 31ST AVENUE, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE  
WYNGATE PLAZA, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE  
ATTACHED WARRANTY DEED AND BILL OF SALE TO BE  
TRANSFERRED FROM THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL (CITY) TO THE  
LAUDERHILL  
COMMUNITY  
REDEVELOPMENT  
AGENCY  
(CRA);  
APPROVING THE WARRANTY DEED AND THE BILL OF SALE  
REGARDING THE TRANSFER; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
8.  
ORDINANCE NO. 24O-01-104: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING  
CAPITAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,707,216.00  
AND SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF  
A
A
$5,945,613.00;  
VARIOUS  
REFLECTING  
REVENUE AND  
APPROPRIATE  
EXPENDITURE  
ADJUSTMENTS  
ACCOUNTS  
TO  
AS  
SPECIFICALLY INDICATED IN THE BREAKDOWN IN THE TOTAL  
AMOUNT OF $7,652,829.00; PROVIDING VARIOUS BUDGET CODE  
NUMBERS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY  
CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Ordinance was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
X RESOLUTIONS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
9.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-22:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE  
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMNESTY LIEN REDUCTION  
PROGRAM  
PROPERTY OWNERS WITH AN ALTERNATIVE FOR SIGNIFICANT LIEN  
REDUCTION ONCE ALL VIOLATIONS ARE BROUGHT INTO  
TO  
PROVIDE  
RESIDENTIAL  
AND  
COMMERCIAL  
COMPLIANCE TO FURTHER EXTEND THE DURATION THROUGH  
JUNE 30, 2024; PROVIDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS; PROVIDING  
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER,  
DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
Attachments:  
Vice Mayor L. Martin wished to emphasize to the Lauderhill community that the  
subject program was established over a year ago, and it was put together as a  
result of the City having many open liens, some reaching in the millions of  
dollars, with some property owners being unaware of any lien against their  
property. The City sent out a notice to every property owner with an open lien  
against their property, so staff was being asked to provide an update  
accordingly, as the program was to address the lingering debt of unpaid liens on  
the City’s books. He said though the program should have closed December  
2023, staff sought an extension due to its success and popularity.  
Deputy City Manager/Finance Director Kennie Hobbs affirmed the program was  
very popular, and some property owners came in on the date of the deadline,  
giving staff no time to review their case with the attention required. City staff  
was requesting approval for an extension. To date, the City collected just under  
$220,000.00, and a number of liens were still being processed, with nine still in  
the pipeline; based on the expiration date, city staff would not be able to process  
them. He said staff found the program to be a success, as it made a number of  
people aware there was a lien on their property, despite the City sending out  
letters previously, and staff speaking at homeowners’ association (HOA)  
meetings on the matter, etc. Thus, some property owners were just coming to  
City Hall to try to resolve their lien issues, so staff saw the need to request that  
the Commission approve an extension of the program to allow more property  
owners time to come in and resolve their issues.  
When it came to code  
compliance, it was more about compliance, and less about the fines, etc.;  
some property owners were unaware that when they came into compliance,  
they still had to request a follow-up inspection by the City to make code staff  
aware that the violations were corrected, so they could close out the case. Mr.  
Hobbs stated, in such situations, the failure to notify staff after correcting the  
violation could result in the matter being forwarded to the magistrate, and the  
assessment of a fine, and then a lien if left unpaid. As people were refinancing  
or selling their property, they discovered a lien was on their property; the lien  
notices brought the matter to their attention, and many sought to rectify their  
situation. He said they had close to 90 participants in the program, and staff  
was working on at least nine; if the program was extended, the number would  
increase.  
City Attorney Rosenberg reminded the Commission that the money collected in  
the program was one percent if the property was homesteaded, or two and a  
half percent if it was not, so it was a small percentage of the lien amount, hence  
the amount collected not being a huge number. However, the City was seeing a  
lot more compliance, as property owners came in after bringing their property  
into compliance in order to get the lien removed; thus, the program was helpful  
to the City with people bringing their property into compliance, and it was helpful  
to property owners, as they were saving money by not having to pay exorbitant  
fines, so it was a win/win situation.  
Mr. Hobbs added that cases pending approvals totaled about $28,000.00, and  
with the passage of the extension, those funds could be collected by the City;  
since January, the City collected just over $15,000.00.  
Vice Mayor L. Martin questioned if the City would send out the lien letters once a  
year to prevent future accumulation of unpaid liens.  
Mr. Hobbs affirmed, on an annual basis, staff sent out lien letters out to property  
owners, normally at the end of the fiscal year as part of the closeout process.  
Commissioner Grant agreed the program was successful, as she brought  
many property owners to the Finance Department staff’s attention to resolve  
their liens that they learned of when they sought to refinance their property.  
Usually a resolution involved a significant amount of money, but staff was  
working with property owners to have them pay a reasonable sum.  
supported extending the program.  
She  
Mayor Thurston opened the discussion to the public.  
Eula Murray-Hylton, Lauderhill resident, commented that extending the program  
was a great thing, as it alerting many people about a lien on their property gave  
them an incentive to resolve the matter.  
enforcement staff, as they did a great job in her neighborhood, trying to work  
with residents. However, rentals were the problem, as many properties were  
She gave a shoutout to code  
owned by deadbeat landlords, some living out of state, others around Florida,  
and she knew the City Manager wrote them letters, asking them to bring their  
properties into compliance, etc. She had a few residents who called her, asking  
for help on getting a neighbor to correct a violation, such as a collapsed fence  
that existed for the past five years. The general public did not understand that  
just because a property owner was cited did not mean the owner would fix their  
property immediately. Ms. Murray-Hylton remarked on the need for a little more  
information and education for the community, and advertising the program over  
the next six months would be very beneficial for the community, and helped  
beautify Lauderhill.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner D.  
Grant, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following  
vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
10.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-23:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING THE SIXTH  
AMENDED ANNUAL CALENDAR OF CITY HOSTED SPECIAL EVENTS  
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE  
(REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
11.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-24:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING AND  
ADOPTING AN EMPLOYEE CODE OF CONDUCT; APPROVING AND  
ADOPTING  
THE  
ATTACHED  
CITY  
POLICIES  
REGARDING  
DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT, WORKPLACE BULLYING, AND  
RETALIATION APPLICABLE TO BOTH EMPLOYEES AND PUBLIC  
OFFICERS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY  
MANAGER, DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
City Attorney Rosenberg stated the Commission was presented with another  
recommendation to pass new, or strengthen existing policies; the proposed  
resolution sought to establish a code of conduct for City employees.  
Mayor Thurston opened the discussion to the public.  
Sergeant Joseph Nistor, president of the Lauderhill Hill Fraternal Order of Police  
(FOP) Lodge 161, said he represented the interest of approximately 115 people,  
roughly 20 percent of the City’s full-time employees. One of his roles was to  
ensure that the approximately 80 policies and procedures police officers abided  
by, and that guided police officer conduct, was fair and commonsense, and that  
they were applied evenly to all members. The proposed new policies regarding  
harassment, discrimination, and retaliation were commonsense.  
He said there  
was a common saying that no one was above the law, including police officers,  
and that was a sentiment he agreed with wholeheartedly; he believed the  
proposed policies would ensure that no Lauderhill employee or official was  
above treating others with dignity and respect. Sergeant Nistor applauded the  
City in its efforts to ensure that all would work in a dignified environment, and he  
respectfully implored the passing of the subject resolution before Commission.  
Mayor Thurston received no further input from the public.  
Commissioner Dunn wished to know if after the policies were passed, how the  
City would ensure everyone adhered to them.  
City Attorney Rosenberg replied there would be training for all City employees,  
though she was not sure about the method by which the Human Resources  
(HR) Department conducted such training; all employees would sign off on  
receiving a copy of the policy and their training.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
12.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-25:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL GRANTING AN  
INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT TO GOV FT. LAUDERDALE, LLC  
F/K/A RP FT. LAUDERDALE, LLC.  
FOR FENCE INSTALLATION AND  
MAINTENANCE ON THE CITY PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THEIR  
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1700 N.W. 40TH AVENUE, LAUDERHILL AS  
LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE  
DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER DESORAE GILES-SMITH).  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
13.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-26:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA OPPOSING  
SENATE BILL 1126 AND HOUSE BILL 1641 BEFORE THE FLORIDA  
LEGISLATURE WHICH SEEK TO PREEMPT THE REGULATION OF  
AUXILIARY CONTAINERS (REUSABLE OR SINGLE-USE BAGS, CUPS,  
BOTTLES OR OTHER PACKAGING) AND DELETE A CURRENT LAW  
PROVISION  
THAT  
REQUIRES  
THE  
DEPARTMENT  
OF  
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO REVIEW AN UPDATE ITS 2010  
REPORT ON RETAIL BAGS AND AUXILIARY CONTAINERS; URGING  
THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO CONTINUE TO RELY ON THE DATA  
REPORTED IN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL  
PROTECTION’S  
LEGISLATION  
RETAIL  
REGARDING  
BAG  
REPORT  
IN  
THE  
OF  
ENACTMENT  
PLASTICS;  
THE  
REGULATION  
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO TRANSMIT THIS  
RESOLUTION; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED  
BY COMMISSIONER, MELISSA DUNN).  
Attachments:  
This Resolution was approved on the Consent Agenda. (See Consideration of  
Consent Agenda for vote tally.)  
14.  
RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-27:  
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY  
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL APPROVING AND  
ADOPTING A CITY POLICY REGARDING USE OF CITY BUILDINGS AND  
FACILITIES FOR POLITICAL CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES; PROVIDING AN  
EFFECTIVE DATE (REQUESTED BY CITY MANAGER, DESORAE  
GILES-SMITH).  
City Attorney Rosenberg commented, while on the journey of passing policies,  
City administration realized this would be a big election year for Lauderhill with  
all five seats on the Commission being for election/reelection.  
There were  
currently 13 candidates running for the five seats, so there would be a lot of  
political activity going on and she thought it would be better for the City to set  
forth a written policy that helped to set out some of the parameters. She saw,  
over the years, questions arose as to what was and was not permitted, so the  
goal was to make things clean and clearcut, so people knew in advance what to  
expect; the drafted page policy set forth various circumstances; for example:  
candidates were not allowed to solicit or accept any political contributions in a  
city building; regarding public access, when candidates were allowed to  
handout flyers in facilities, going through the details in each of them; neither city  
employees nor assets could be used for campaigning during business hours;  
after business hours, employees had a right to represent as they wished with  
regard to voicing support, etc. for particular candidates.  
City assets included  
supplies, photocopiers, paper, services, equipment, computers, telephones,  
vehicles, etc. Ms. Rosenberg stated the resolution outlined specific parameters  
for posting signs within a right of way; for example, political signs could not be  
posted on any city property, and the Clerk’s Office would provide a copy of the  
policy to all candidates, along with a map showing all City-owned properties in  
Lauderhill, so there was no confusion as to where political signs could not be  
posted.  
Political signs could not be posted on private property without the  
permission of the property owner, and candidates could not solicit within 100  
feet of an election polling place. She noted, along with the code for candidates,  
the language reinforced candidates were not to engage in negative campaigns,  
or use negative inferences, as the goal was to foster positive campaigning.  
Candidates had to ensure any information they communicated about their  
opponents went through reasonable factchecking to prevent the dissemination  
of false material. She said the language included provisions for the use of the  
City’s show mobile that was permitted for rental; candidates could pay to rent  
the show mobile, and the City’s website contained a clear disclosure that the  
rental of the City’s show mobile in no way represented an endorsement or  
support of a person, entity, company, group, product, or campaign for which it  
was being rented. There were provisions for equal time that dealt with when  
candidates were speaking at an event that they each be given equal time to  
speak.  
Vice Mayor L. Martin encouraged HOA presidents in particular to inform the  
residents of their communities about some of these guidelines, as it was quite  
common for some candidates to stick their campaign signs on peoples private  
property without asking permission. HOA presidents should take the time to go  
through the policy, highlight the parts they thought specifically applied to their  
community, and communicate them to their residents.  
He thanked FOP  
President Sergeant Nistor for representing the men and women at such a high  
level, noting Sergeant Nistor’s comments were spot on.  
Commissioner Grant sought clarification that equal time was in relation to city  
events.  
City Attorney Rosenberg answered no; a federal regulation governed the use of  
outsiders, such as radio and television. If, for example, for Lauderhills  
commission elections a radio station gave free time to a candidate on their  
station, the station had to give the same amount of time to all other candidates.  
It was different if a candidate paid for the time, but other candidates had to be  
given the same opportunity to pay for the same slots.  
Commissioner Grant wished to know more about the posting of larger signs.  
City Attorney Rosenberg stated there was a sign ordinance detailing with what  
actions were and were not permitted, with specific details on location, etc. The  
subject resolution focused on getting permission to post signs, but the sign  
code had language on the specific parameters regarding dimension, location,  
removal, etc. She said the Clerk’s Office would provide these policies to all  
election candidates.  
Mayor Thurston opened the discussion to the public.  
Willie Mae Cooper, Lauderhill resident, and president of the West Ken Lark  
HOA, remarked during past elections there was a lot of destruction of signs,  
asking if there were any penalties for that, understanding the City could not post  
cameras everywhere in the City.  
She felt there should be a penalty, and  
whoever helped candidates in their campaign should be advised that removing  
election opponents’ signs was unacceptable. There should be a limit on the  
number of signs posted on a property.  
Commissioner Grant remarked it was possible to place small cameras on the  
signs.  
Varion Harris, Lauderhill resident, and president of the United Lauderhill  
Community Association, asked if the City Clerk’s Office could ensure all HOA  
presidents received a copy of the policies.  
City Attorney Rosenberg clarified that Mr. Harris was requesting the subject  
policy be provided.  
Commissioner Dunn thought Ms. Cooper’s comments brought to mind the lack  
of courtesy candidates sometimes showed each other during election times;  
she remembered when she campaigned there was a lot of nastiness, so she  
hoped in the upcoming elections all candidates led by example, and they  
embodied the core values they wished to see in Lauderhill, which were peace  
and cooperation.  
She believed it was possible to compete in a respectful  
manner and in a way that set a great example for the Citys young people. It  
was a call to action for all candidates.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that this Resolution be approved. The motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
15. RESOLUTION NO. 24R-02-28 REMOVED  
XI QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS (IF NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA)  
XII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, FIRST READING  
XIII QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTERS, SECOND READING  
XIV UNFINISHED BUSINESS  
XV OLD BUSINESS  
XVI NEW BUSINESS  
A.  
A
DISCUSSION OF CANCELLATION OF MARCH 11, 2024 CITY  
COMMISSION MEETING.  
City Attorney Rosenberg mentioned a majority of the Commission would be  
away attending the National League of Cities Conference in Washington, D.C.,  
so achieving a quorum would not be possible.  
A motion was made by Vice Mayor L. Martin, seconded by Commissioner M.  
Dunn, that the March 11, 2024, City Commission meeting be cancelled. The  
motion carried by the following vote:  
5 -  
Yes:  
Commissioner M. Dunn, Commissioner D. Grant, Vice Mayor L. Martin,  
Commissioner S. Martin, and Mayor K. Thurston  
0
Abstain:  
XVII  
COMMUNICATIONS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY  
BEFORE ADJOURNMENT  
Vice Mayor L. Martin provided the following update:  
• The Mayor, police and fire staff, and he had the esteemed pleasure of hosting  
members of the National Bahamian Royal Police while they were in the U.S. for  
training under a federal program; there were about 18 individuals, and they  
visited the City’s fire and police departments; it was  
a good, eye-opening  
experience; there could be some opportunities for sharing of events  
• He attended a Fore Life program fundraising event; they teamed up with  
Lawrence Taylor the past week; Paula Tucker always had initiatives for children  
to raise money; it was a family outing for the children to give them something  
different to do in Miami at a jai alai game  
A
Bahamian documentary titled “Crossing the Waters” aired at the  
African-American Research Library and Cultural Center the previous week;  
there was a wonderful turnout for the event, including a host of dignitaries; the  
Mayor and he were of Bahamian descent and there were many good stories  
coming from the Bahamas; many Bahamians settled in areas of Florida, such  
as Coconut Grove, Hollywood, Lauderhill, etc., and helped to build the  
community they lived in  
• The MLK 2024 music celebration at the Lauderhill Performing Arts Center  
(LPAC) was a wonderful event with great music artistry, and the turnout for the  
event was great; a good time was had by all; homage was paid to former City  
Commissioner Margaret Bates, who championed MLK events while serving on  
the Commission  
• The Broward County League of Cities was soliciting funds to raise money for  
scholarships, so if his colleagues, or anyone in the audience wished to donate,  
it would be greatly appreciated; to do so, they could contact his office or him for  
more information; the money went to Broward County students and schools,  
and to lobby to ensure Lauderhill schools were represented.  
Commissioner Dunn updated the Commission and Lauderhill public on the  
following:  
• On February 12, 2024, at 6:00 p.m., the fire department’s Station 57 at 1980  
NW 56th Avenue would host a Lauderhill Health and Prosperity Partnership  
(LHPP) meeting; anyone wishing to join them was welcome to attend the  
in-person meeting  
• The past weekend she had the opportunity to represent the City at a Florida  
League of Cities Leadership event, along with elected officials from other cities  
• The coming Tuesday, Parks & Recreation Director Scott Newton, Assistant  
Director Daphne Dyer, and she were heading to Sacramento, California, for the  
final convening of the National League of Cities Youth Excel Grant; she  
congratulated the City’s Parks Department for doing such a great job with that  
program  
• Saturday, February 17, 2024, the City would host STEM Saturday at the  
Lauderhill Museum; this was an opportunity for children eight years and older to  
learn, and get hands on experience with STEM career options  
• The City Manager and Niah Washington had a site visit with the board of  
directors for A. D. Henderson Foundation, thanking them for standing in for her;  
the foundation was funding the work the City was doing with the neighborhoods  
of Devonhunt and Lauderhill Pointe; they invested over $200,000.00 in those  
Lauderhill communities; the City Manager made  
foundation’s board of directors  
a
presentation to the  
• She thanked the Mayor and City Manager for hosting the Principals Roundtable  
with the LHPP education sub-council; she was told that several Lauderhill  
school principals attended, and they shared their needs with the community  
• Ms. Washington and she went to the Health Foundation of South Florida the  
morning of February 12th to meet with their president, and the senior leadership  
team to present the impact report; the document was available to anyone  
wishing to see the work the LHPP was doing; the Health Foundation was very  
pleased with the results they got with their investment in the City of Lauderhill  
• On the 27th of February, Ms. Washington and she were going to Washington,  
D.C., to attend the Black Health Summit hosted by the White House and the  
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS); the intent was to bring  
back resources to benefit the City of Lauderhill  
• Lauderhill Shines Cohort 8 would begin on Wednesday, February 21, 2024;  
she invited her colleagues to stop by for the welcome reception and say hello to  
the new business owners; they had over 60 applications and they expected to  
have a class of about 35 or 40 participants.  
Commissioner S. Martin wished to publicly state there were many murders and  
other crimes taking place in the City of Lauderhill, which the Citys  
administration acknowledge. He wished to assure the community that the City  
Commission, along with the Lauderhill Police Chief and City Manager were  
working toward a solution.  
They had a meeting the coming week to start  
discussing some of those options. He went out the previous Friday to do a ride  
along through the community where many of the murders were taking place off  
NW 19th Street. Police Chief Constance Stanley was commended for having a  
great team, and they would continue to work together to see where they could  
improve the City (video shown).  
City Manager Giles-Smith called on Police Chief Stanley to speak on some of  
the incidents that occurred in Lauderhill, as there appeared to be a plethora of  
unpleasant activities occurring, including shootings, domestic violence, etc.  
The City of Lauderhill was not alone in such occurrences, as they were  
happening in other cities, but each resident of Lauderhill was concerned with  
what was happening in their city.  
Police Chief Stanley reviewed the number of homicides the City had in 2024  
thus far, compared to the number in previous years. Since the beginning of  
2024, six homicides occurred in Lauderhill, five gun-related, and one stabbing;  
all the cases were still actively open, and there was a warrant for a suspect in  
one of the cases. She said one case was a domestic violence matter. As her  
department dealt with the homicides, they looked at the number of victims and  
suspects who resided in Lauderhill, and, so far, the cases for 2024 showed  
three victims resided in Lauderhill, and two suspects resided in Lauderhill.  
In  
2023, there was a total of 15 homicides; seven were closed by arrests, three of  
cases were domestic related, four were investigated and were pending that  
would lead to either an arrest, or being forwarded to the State Attorneys Office;  
for three cases all leads were exhausted. Eight of the 15 victims resided in the  
City of Lauderhill, as did three suspects. In 2022, there were a total of 17  
homicides, one involving multiple victims that resulted in 18 deaths; eight were  
cleared by arrests, three were presented to the State Attorneys Office for  
stand-your-ground self-defense; four cases were domestic related; two were  
cleared by exception, and for two of the cases all leads were exhausted, with  
one case sent to the State Attorney’s Office. Eight victims resided in the City of  
Lauderhill, as did five of the suspects. In 2021, there were 21 homicides, two  
multiple victims, totaling 23 death; ten were closed by arrests, one cleared by  
exception; one case was sent to the State Attorney’s Office for review, and it  
appeared to be  
exhausted, with three cases being domestic related.  
the department used technology, and other resources, including  
a
case of self-defense; in all five cases, all leads were  
Chief Stanley explained  
domestic  
a
violence grant of $269,000.00 over a two-year period; the purpose of the grant  
was to educate the community, both perpetrators and victims; they already  
began the process, and they would be scheduling those sessions at various  
parks throughout the City. There was a Cold Case, DNA, and Homicide and  
Violent Crimes federal grant; the department was in communication with the  
federal agency that provided the grant of $533,000.00, and it was awarded by  
the Department of Justice (DOJ) over a three-year period; the grant would cover  
a variety of things, including: DNA testing, and overtime to help close out cases.  
She mentioned SoundThinking, formerly known as ShotSpotter, went live since  
April of 2023, covering about 4.6 miles in the City of Lauderhill; she went over  
the number of alerts since its inception, a total number of 837, with 86 in 2024;  
many people did not call when they heard gunfire, so ShotSpotter alerted the  
department, so officers could get to the crime location quicker, so they could,  
possibly, save a life, and collect evidence. In five of the alerts, they were able to  
collect shell casings at the scene, and with the City partnering with the Federal  
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives (ATF), they were  
able to solve five of the crimes. The City had license plate readers (LDR), a  
total of 172 at 99 locations; she knew one of the neighboring cities spoke to a  
member of the City Commission about Lauderhill helping them to solve cases;  
whatever her department could do it would to assist the Citys neighboring  
partners.  
They, too, had been tremendous in helping Lauderhill identify  
suspects. Chief Stanley said there was cell phone technology, and Lauderhill  
partnered with various federal agencies able to assist in solving cases; they had  
access to many more resources that were available throughout the County.  
DNA Labs was tremendous in helping the department identify evidence.  
She  
mentioned the City’s numerous community events, at which there was always a  
police presence; their goal was to engage with local residents and businesses  
to get them to trust the police. The department had a street enforcement team  
(SET), and they focused on identifying issues, and she wished to commend  
Vice Mayor L. Martin in his efforts to deal with local the convenience stores;  
though officers patrolled and covered areas of the City, the SET officers  
addressed recurring problematic issues and helped provide maintenance and  
surveillance, etc., whatever was needed to address issues.  
Other community  
policing programs included: Rescue Our Kids (R.O.K.) Academy, a program for  
children, and she mentioned a recent article about violence among teens and  
youth; Citizens Observer Patrol (COP). She reviewed the previously-mentioned  
article on violence among teens and youth that was published by the Sun  
Sentinel, in which it stated forgotten children were most in need of help. The  
article was written based on work by a group, Inner City Innovators, that was  
created to identify children with issues, and trying to get to the root cause of  
their problems.  
The article noted, though there was gun violence across  
Florida, and in other age groups such incidents plateaued, shootings among  
teens continued to rise, and experts failed to identify the cause of this trend.  
She said the article indicated the total number of fatal shootings involving  
teenagers rose sharply in Florida, and across the U.S. in 2020, according to the  
data from the Gun Violence Archive, dipping in 2021, before rising in 2022, and  
reaching a new high in 2023. Most of the violence was clustered in densely  
populated areas, such as South Florida. She urged Commission members to  
review the article, as her officers and she believed it would take a multifaceted  
approach; it was not something they could do alone.  
Regarding domestic  
violence and the department’s intervention efforts, along with the grant  
mentioned earlier, City Manager Giles-Smith, Deputy Allen Siegel, City Attorney  
Rosenberg, and she went to the State Attorney’s Office to speak with Broward  
County State Attorney Harold Pryor to discuss the City’s repeat offenders of  
domestic violences; they found such cases had declined, and much of the  
remaining incidents were due to repeat offenders. Her department was working  
with City administration to figure out what the City could do to work with the  
State Attorney’s Office to ensure domestic violence perpetrators did not  
become repeat offenders.  
She recently met with Women in Distriess  
representatives to discuss domestic violence, and some of their efforts to  
address its occurrence; and the department was working on a joint effort with  
them. Chief Stanley mentioned one of the City’s recent shootings took place on  
University Drive at one of the clubs, stating the department was challenged with  
businesses that were not abiding by their certificate of use (COU), as the  
particular business where the shooting occurred should have closed at 2:00  
a.m., but they did not close, and the incident occurred at 3:30 a.m. Specifically,  
patrons were still inside when the incident occurred, and there could have been  
more deaths, as the shooting took place in the parking lot due to some dispute.  
They had some recent conversations with the manager of that business, where  
the department would be doing something similar to what was done with the  
convenience stores, making sure businesses the department was having  
issues with stayed in compliance with their COU, etc. She said these issues  
would be addressed via a team that would include law enforcement and code  
enforcement officers. One of the biggest challenges the police faced was  
uncooperative witnesses refusing to get involved, and the same was true of  
some victims, who thought they could take matters into their own hands. She  
said this made it very challenging for detectives, so they continued to encourage  
people to provide officers with information, regardless of the method of  
communication. If they received the information ahead of time, they could take  
action, be proactive where possible, such as getting a tip ahead of time about a  
shooting planned at a particular location, so officers could get there before the  
incident. The City’s website had information on how to report crime, and the  
Neighbors app was a good app to download, as the department received a  
significant amount of footage, and people could remain anonymous. There was  
also Crime Stoppers tips, the nonemergency number, the text to 911 system  
that was up and running. Chief Stanley mentioned having a meeting with Crime  
Stoppers a few months prior, and the department acted on all the tips they  
received from Crime Stoppers; they were all reviewed and assigned  
appropriately.  
She said Crime Stoppers generated a report containing cases  
they assisted with, and they kept track of whether an arrest was made. There  
was a lot of information she could not share with the public and the media, as it  
could jeopardize a case, the witnesses, etc.  
City Manager Giles-Smith stated Chief Stanley and her staff did a great job  
making sure Lauderhill was kept as crime free as possible, but it was the  
responsibility of every citizen of Lauderhill; if they saw something happening,  
they should report it, whether to the police, city administration, elected officials  
via text, email, phone call, etc., and they could remain anonymous if they  
wished.  
These efforts helped the department keep the wrongdoers off  
Lauderhill’s streets, so if anyone witnessed a crime, the City needed them to  
give that information to the police; this was the way crimes were solved.  
Chief Stanley concurred, stating a pastor contacted her with information passed  
on by a member of their congregation; someone was being bullied at school,  
and they were able to get involved to resolve the situation. She thanked the  
pastor for bringing the matter to her attention, and helping the police to take care  
of the community.  
City Manager Giles-Smith said half the crimes taking place in Lauderhill were  
domestic-related, meaning many people were well aware of what was  
happening, family and friends.  
violence, so people needed to take the time to stop and think before saying  
things that could cause situation to escalate, choose to walk away to  
Such behavior was seldom random acts of  
a
deescalate a brewing situation, cool down, and not take actions into their hands  
that resulted in committing violence against another.  
Vice Mayor L. Martin remarked many such issues were discussed in his  
monthly meetings with the City Manager Giles-Smith, and Chief Stanley, and he  
agreed it was a requirement of the community to get more involved in helping to  
deal with these situations. He cautioned his colleagues on how they framed  
things, such as when speaking to the media, or other parties outside Lauderhill;  
as professionals, they did a very good job, but statistics could be manipulated,  
and sensationalizing incidents in the media sometimes made the City look  
worse than the reality. Yet all the wonderful things taking place in Lauderhill  
were rarely featured. He knew that statistics showed crime had gone down in  
the City, considering that Lauderhill’s population had increased, so it was a  
matter of how data was presented. He believed Lauderhill had one of the best  
police forces in Broward County, possibly the State, and the Citys police force  
was nearly fully staffed, unlike some other agencies, so the City was doing  
something right.  
Commissioner Dunn echoed commendations to Chief Stanley and her staff.  
She reiterated that peace was each person’s responsibility, and for Lauderhill to  
be a peaceful and prosperous city, it would not take the work of just the  
Lauderhill Police Department, each person in Lauderhill had to work at it. The  
City now had a mechanism by which each person could play a role; that is, the  
Lauderhill Peace 365 campaign. She hosted a meeting with some of the HOA  
presidents, as she hoped the City’s HOAs would get involved and engaged;  
about 14 churches signed up; there was an opportunity for everyone in  
Lauderhill to take an active role. Research would be conducted to identify the  
root cause of violence, so the data could be shared to create programming that  
would go straight to the heart of the matter, including teaching conflict resolution  
skills, mindfulness skill, and they would hold peace and reconciliation  
conversations. There would be a communication campaign set to kick off in  
April 2024. She noted, over the next three to six weeks, they would reach out to  
different stakeholders in the community to engage folks.  
Mayor Thurston stated years ago mayors across the County came up with a  
program to encourage children to play chess, starting with children eight years  
of age and up, rotating the monthly chess challenge monthly around the County.  
The City of Lauderhill would be hosting the chess challenge on March 9, 2024,  
11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at Veterans Park. He, too, would be playing chess. He  
mentioned the Northwest Council of Locally Elected Officials met today, at  
which eight cities were represented; all said they had not yet paid the  
$10,000.00 for the Form 6 litigation, though they said they would.  
On an  
individual basis, they expressed the frustration of having to provide such a  
detailed disclosure; the Form 6 disclosure imposed by the State of Florida on  
elected officials was more severe than any other state in the U.S. A few of the  
ladies present at the meeting said they worked hard, got a pension from the  
School Board, then decided to help their community by running for office; now  
they had to disclose where their income came from, opening them up to  
becoming a target. Thus, it was unfair that elected officials ran for office not  
knowing they would ever have to make such a detailed financial disclosure,  
because the rules changed while they were serving. He believed it should only  
apply to people who were not currently serving as elected officials.  
He  
mentioned he did not originate his Move with the Mayor (MWTM) program, as  
many cities across the country had MWTM programs, and they did public  
service announcements (PSA) on vaccinations. The last PSA was on getting  
the flu shot, and there were three million impressions from ten mayors giving a  
statement about why people should get the flu vaccine. He reported that from  
the statement he gave about the importance of getting the flu vaccine, the one  
from Lauderhill generated  
210,000 impressions.  
The MWTM program  
encouraged people to move, stay healthy, and get vaccinated.  
XVIII ADJOURNMENT - 8:40 PM